ROTTEN TOMATOES: Critical Consensus: "Vendetta" Hits, "Man" Misses Comments

Critical Consensus: "Vendetta" Hits, "Man" Misses

by Jen Yamato | March 16, 2006

Summary

This week's wide releases highlight a rarely-tread path in modern cinema, as both pics feature two of America's sweethearts -- every geek's fave, Natalie Portman, and cute little Amanda Bynes -- enduring two very different boyish makeovers, with two very different results. Will "Vendetta" live up to the hype? Can a girly "Man" make teens swoon for Shakespeare? The scribes will tell us! Back to Article

(1-26 of 26 posts) | Reply

knowingtoast85 writes:
on Mar 17 2006 01:17 AM

It was too long, and the script was pure Wachowski, for better and worse, but the leads were excellent and the production was solid. A couple of pubescent boys behind me mock-snored late into the film, probably out of frustration with the lack of action sequences, which is a shame. I think they'd have really enjoyed the movie, as ham-fisted as it often was, if they didn't go in expecting whatever gun-toting superaction barrage that they were expecting.

(Reply to this)

mstiefan writes:
on Mar 17 2006 09:38 AM

[b]Just one of the Guys[/b]
I'm very surprised not to see more references to the movie Just one of the Guys (or as one of the cream of the crop reviewers calls it, Just one of the Boys). I mean he's a top critic and can't get a movie title correct.

THe Twelth Night parallels are obvious, but this movie was already made. Haha, she likes the guy when she's a guy. She can't be on the skins team in soccer (basketball in JOOTG). At least Guys gives us the great payoff of sitting through this agonizing movie plot by showing off some excellent breasts.

(Reply to this)

lovelykeira writes:
on Mar 17 2006 10:38 AM

I going to V tonight.

(Reply to this)

Jen Yamato writes:
on Mar 17 2006 10:52 AM

In reply to this comment (#832381)
Let's not forget another great cross-dressing teen soccer film, Ladybugs. RIP, Jonathan Brandis.

(Reply to this)

synergyred writes:
on Mar 17 2006 06:07 PM

Just got back from seeing V and let me tell you, it's everything that it was hyped up to be.

(Reply to this)

AgentIndigo writes:
on Mar 17 2006 07:07 PM

Yes, I just got back from seeing it too, and it rocks. I found V better than Batman Begins.

(Reply to this)

I Am Remote writes:
on Mar 17 2006 09:59 PM

I liked it a lot too. Really excellent stuff.

Not better than Batman Begins though...

(Reply to this)

SIRxxxTMG writes:
on Mar 18 2006 01:29 AM

V for Vendetta kicked ass on so many levels.

(Reply to this)

Hanniballistic writes:
on Mar 18 2006 08:47 AM

"-- which have been labeled terrorist-like by some --"

This statement makes me sad. Like the reviewers didn't really get the message of the film.

(Reply to this)

hoffmand writes:
on Mar 18 2006 08:54 AM

I agree with Hanniballistic. So many reviewers simply did not get it.

I've written a smack-down of those numbskulls at my blog

http://ballsandwalnuts.com

Doug

(Reply to this)

Elixir writes:
on Mar 18 2006 10:16 AM

i think its time to say the wachowskis have earned the right to be called brilliant film makers and script writers.

yes, i do believe thy have earned it.

(Reply to this)

lovelykeira writes:
on Mar 18 2006 10:48 AM

I was dissapointed actually, seems like I'm the only one here though that thinks that way. I gave it a C.

(Reply to this)

starvin writes:
on Mar 18 2006 12:22 PM

A lot of it was painfully predictable and cliched. But the overall direction/writing/production more than made up for it. The last 45 minutes of it was a total rush too. And Natalie Portman was a bonerific as ever. 9/10

(Reply to this)

necron91 writes:
on Mar 18 2006 03:39 PM

there wasn't any mindless violence in the film, that's what's too expectant of most of u guys here, the story outways the action, though i did think the film was a little too long, but it was more inportant to tell the story from V, not through his fighting style - which i think is pretty cool too, especially during the underground "knife time" sequence......

i thought the film was superb for taking a different approach for such a theme rather than kicking, punching and shooting their way through it. a good example of hollywood shouldn't be afraid of it's audience, but of it's film-makers.....

(Reply to this)

nazgul writes:
on Mar 18 2006 10:05 PM

i just watched this as well. I have to agree with most people here, this movie rocked! Some ver nice moments in there that I really enjoyed. I just migh go see it again tomorrow.

(Reply to this)

sostra writes:
on Mar 19 2006 08:33 AM

[b]V is awesome[/b]
V is a great film! A little long but it keeps you entertained. I though Hugo Weaving did a great job as potraying V as a likable,fun guy. He was such as bad-ass with his knives..I just wish there was a few more butt-kickin sceans!

(Reply to this)

TheIceGhost writes:
on Mar 19 2006 10:35 AM

[b]V for Victory[/b]
Saw it Friday night, and I thought it was amazing. The last third did become predictable but enjoyable nontheless. I'll say it now, in 5 years it will be a cult classic, and this Halloween I bet there is going to be a lot of kids runnin' around in V masks, which for once wont annoy me at all.

(Reply to this)

SydeX writes:
on Mar 19 2006 11:52 AM

[b]Terrorism? or Revolution?[/b]
Having read the Graphic Novel of V for Vendetta (i havent seen the movie yet) and reading people's comments about it, I think a lot of people judge the intentions of the story too quickly. Remember that this book was written almost 16 years ago (1989) and the world back then was really different from today's hijackers and mass suicide bombers. A really interesting thing for me is that the idea behind the movie is quite interesting because if you relate it in some point to current world events, it makes a lot of sense and a lot of thinking. The goverment sees V as a terrorist and a threat, but the people see V as a hero and a way of freedom of speech, thinking and culture. Now, think about this in modern day events, even if terrorism is a bad way of conducting an ideal (because of the mass death rates) couldnt terrorism be also a way of revolution to a current day corporate controlled system? who says our goverments aren't wrong, and we are blindedly following their ideas because we only see their vision and they tell us their right, and no one else. What if terrorism is another way to see, the truth?

I like to keep an open mind to these sort of topics because Im an artist and I like to think a lot about this, but I read an interesting paragraph about "V and Terrorism" and one of the most interesting parts of the read was this: "what would you think, if you took away V's mask, and Osama Bin Laden was behind it?".

(Reply to this)

synergyred writes:
on Mar 19 2006 01:17 PM

In reply to this comment (#832397)
Well one thing I think is good to keep in mind as far as V's terrorism is that V didn't target civillians but people of the goverment. When he attacked a building (Parliment, the TV station) he was more concerned with getting rid of the building, instead of the people inside. Think about it. He always gave the people insdie of the building plenty of time to get out. I do not know if the graphic novels are the same. I've never read them, but it makes V a little more sympathetic.

(Reply to this)

CrazyGhost78 writes:
on Mar 19 2006 04:49 PM

[b]V for kick ass[/b]
I just got back from it. We were late because the ****ing paper printed the wrong time, so we missed 5/10 minutes, but thats just an excuse to see it again. I loved every second of it. The CG blood at the end made me weep for moviemaking, but aside from that, it was downright awesome.

(Reply to this)

nazgul writes:
on Mar 19 2006 07:08 PM

the ONLY thing I didnt like was the omission of Allan Moores Name in the Credits, that was a load of S$*^!!

(Reply to this)

SydeX writes:
on Mar 19 2006 07:59 PM

In reply to this comment (#832400)
it was because he said it himself he didnt want to take part of the movie in any way, shape or form. Even if he wrote the book, this means he won't take part of the movie in anyway, its more like...he never wrote the source material : (

(Reply to this)

crazydiamond writes:
on Mar 19 2006 11:34 PM

saw it last night, i thought it was excellent. the speech the inspector gives about half way through is chilling, makes me want to start a revolution.

(Reply to this)

nogard64 writes:
on Mar 20 2006 01:12 AM

[b]what![/b]
it was a snooze fest! If you wanna watch politics just turn on the evening news! For a action hero, V sure rambled on and on and on and on! If I was a bad guy I would have begged him to kill me instead of listening to his long speeches. The only plus was of course Natalie Portman, and I really enjoyed the knife time slow mo action (instead of bullet time) it was pretty cool really, kinda reminded me of Neo shooting up the Federal building in Matrix. Other than that it was so predictable and boring.

(Reply to this)

synergyred writes:
on Mar 20 2006 11:30 AM

In reply to this comment (#832403)
You do realize that it wasn't meant to be an action movie but a drama? Yes there were action scenes, but they were not as important as the plot and characters. It seems like you were just expecting something that it wasn't trying to be.

(Reply to this)

hellhole writes:
on Apr 03 2006 09:35 AM

People who are quick to defend V's actions are just as wrong as the people who are quick to label him a terrorist.

The character is morally ambiguous. Cheer for him as a revolutionary all you want, but the bottom line is that he uses some extremely questionable (and terrorist) tactics as a means to an end. Much of the time I was watching it, I was reminded very strongly of another comic book character: James Gordon, from Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns. Gordon likens Batman to Franklin D. Roosevelt, whom many historians allege had advance knowledge of the Pearl Harbor bombings, and allowed them to happen anyway. Is it okay to stand by and do nothing when something terrible is happening if it could ultimately lead to some kind of good? Alan Moore's The Watchmen explores a similar theme.

The point is, it's not right to simply box V in as a bad guy and be done with it. But it's not right to cheerlead his actions either. If V existed in real life, and was blowing up buildings in retaliation against wrongs he felt the government was commiting, he WOULD be labeled as a terrorist.

(A brief post-script to all the people who argue that he always attacked the buildings after the people had gotten out: go back to your Sunday morning cartoons.

When FUNimation Productions first produced an American version of the popular Japanese cartoon Dragon Ball Z, they felt that showing a bad guy blowing up a jet with the pilots inside would be too intense for the kids. So when the jet got blown up, they added in a line for one of the off-camera good guys: "I can see their parachutes! They're okay!" The line is legendary among long-time fans as a symbol of how sanitized and skewed the show became in its transition from Japan to America.

Perhaps you could "see their parachutes" in V For Vendetta, but I didn't see any.)

(Reply to this)

Related Links

She's The Man

Related Articles

Most Discussed

Latest News

Latest Interviews

Latest Features

Sponsored Links