RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Check out the new RT Community
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
Peter Jackson and New Line to Kiss and Make Up?
Judge's ruling could pave the way for a Jackson-directed Hobbit.
by Jeff Giles | October 05, 2007
Discuss Article
After months of duking it out with New Line in the courts (and in public), it appears as if a path may have finally been cleared for Peter Jackson to return to Middle-earth.

We aren't going to get heavily into the details here -- we are only humble gossipmongers without law degrees, after all, and the court case between Jackson and New Line involves armies of attorneys and roughly $300 gazillion -- but this week, a judge rapped the studio on the knuckles for failing to provide key documents. New Line now must pay a $125,000 sanction, and has until Tuesday to turn over internal audits relating to disputed profits from the Lord of the Rings movies.

It sounds like a perfectly boring detail from a big ol' lawsuit, but it's potentially meaningful for Lord of the Rings fans, because the judge's decision could very well open up negotiations for a settlement between Jackson and New Line...and, in the process, set wheels in motion for The Hobbit. As Entertainment Weekly puts it:

At this writing, no agreements have been announced and details of the negotiations are sketchy (neither New Line nor Jackson's camp would comment to EW on any aspect of this story), but sources close to the talks tell us that they're detecting a lot less frost in the air, and that a deal may be reached that could help usher J.R.R. Tolkien's maiden Middle-earth masterpiece to screens before the end of the decade.

''There has been a détente,'' says one insider. "There is now the beginning of a discourse between Peter Jackson and New Line that's running parallel to the litigation proceedings.''


There's a lot more to the story, obviously -- but luckily for you, to read a fairly comprehensive, five-page rundown of the whole thing, all you've got to do is click on the link below. Get clickin'!

Source: Entertainment Weekly

Related Items
Movie: The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Celeb: Peter Jackson
Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-20 of 31 posts) | Reply
Heath H.
Heath H. writes:
on Oct 05 2007 06:14 AM

Well, it's a first step. I wouldn't mind 'The Hobbit' going into development.

(Reply to this)
Landshark
Landshark writes:
on Oct 05 2007 06:28 AM

I really, really hope this is true.

(Reply to this)
Crenshaw
Crenshaw writes:
on Oct 05 2007 07:02 AM

We wants it. Oh yes precious.

(Reply to this)
Jenkinsbball
Jenkinsbball writes:
on Oct 05 2007 08:18 AM

It's funny how New Line was shunning Jackson, when he made them their most profitable movies ever. They will eventually blow him and beg him to make the Hobbit. Which is good, because a world with no Hobbit movie is a world I wouldn't want to live in.

(Reply to this)
Shatter24
Shatter24 writes:
on Oct 05 2007 08:22 AM

I hope this gets this film going. The original cast isn't getting any younger (ask Christopher Lee), and you really need the necessary cast members to reprise their roles and Jackson to adapt and direct again (or it won't mesh with the other films, which it should).

It seems New Line needed a whack to the head by a judge to handle this situation correctly. Now that they (and their overbearing president) find out they are in the wrong for withholding those documents, they can get off their self-righteous horses and get the prequel made.

After all, everybody wins if Jackson comes back. What has New Line done since the LOTR trilogy that has garnered even half the money or critical acclaim that was rec'd thanks to Jackson. Don't bite the hand that feeds you New Line. You shouldn't need a judge to tell you that.


(Reply to this)
Heath H.
Heath H. writes:
on Oct 05 2007 09:07 AM

I hope is gets rolling after 'The Lovely Bones' as well. Time is a factor with this one.

(Reply to this)
Heath H.
Heath H. writes:
on Oct 05 2007 09:08 AM

However, I'd liek to clarify, I wouldn't want to see this film rushed

(Reply to this)
dracus
dracus writes:
on Oct 05 2007 09:42 AM

Well duh, like no one saw that coming.

(Reply to this)
photosuperstar
photosuperstar writes:
on Oct 05 2007 09:42 AM

liek?

(Reply to this)
photosuperstar
photosuperstar writes:
on Oct 05 2007 09:44 AM

Spelling lesson: LIKE

(Reply to this)
walkingdead09
walkingdead09 writes:
on Oct 05 2007 11:56 AM

Peter Jackson sucks and so do the Lord of the rings movies, but they do make a lot of money, so I suppose they oughta get over it and continue to keep makin money. Don't reply telling me the movies don't suck because they do, watch the first one the opening shots are horrible and Peter Jackson is over rated.

(Reply to this)
Crenshaw
Crenshaw writes:
on Oct 05 2007 11:57 AM

Photosuperstar = dick of the day. Tough to edit your copy once you hit that Submit button. But it looks like you found that out yourself. And who gives a rat's about minor typos - the intent is clear. Sheesh - get a frickin' life or something.

OK, on to the post about people not getting any younger. Depending on how true to the book they go, the only real concern here is Gandalf and Elrond. I think it is clear they won't be able to use Ian Holm as Bilbo unless they do some serious makeup work. His brief shot finding the ring in the prologue was just that - brief. But hey they can do almost anything these days. Now, if they decide to turn this into TWO films (part one takes our hero through Mirkwood and fades out just as Bilbo spots the Lonely Mountain in the distance as he and the barreled-up dwarves float down the river; part two deals with all the politics and the dragon and some actual character development for Bard and a really awesome Battle of Five Armies) they could also have time to include Gandalf and the Wizard's Council doing battle against the Necromancer. THEN they would need Christopher Lee. Pl;us, they could easily sneak in cameos of the other players - Legolas in the background of the Elf King's; Gimli among the Dwarves in the Battle of Five Armies, Aragorn in the background at Rivendell. Those would all be pretty cheeseball but still kinda fun!

Whew - I guess I had a lot to get off my chest! :-)


(Reply to this)
arendr
arendr writes:
on Oct 05 2007 12:15 PM

In reply to this comment (#1169802)
"THEN they would need Christopher Lee"

Yikes! They'd better hurry up and film then. I think I see the bony fingers of death on Christopher Lee's shoulder!


(Reply to this)
damvbat
damvbat writes:
on Oct 05 2007 01:28 PM

Yea all this wating is making me not to watch it anymore bring on Superman

(Reply to this)
Bloody Mathias
Bloody Mathias writes:
on Oct 05 2007 02:55 PM

Lovely Bones, Halo and The Hobbit.

My god, i don't know anyone who has such a trio of great projects coming down the pipeline and if you combine that with Heavenly Creatures, LOTR and King Kong and you've got the most consistenly great director since, Hitchcock, Kubrick and Speilberg.

Yeah, New Line is being idiotic about this, politicly, artisitly, and economicly.


(Reply to this)
oldnoakes
oldnoakes writes:
on Oct 05 2007 04:56 PM

In reply to this comment (#1170184)
do I detect sarcasm?

I have only seen Jackson's mainstream work. And unless someone comes along with over a billion dollars to make a new Lord of the Rings with six parts then a better movie probably wasn't possible. You should hink of the lord of the rings as one novel, in six parts, which is what Tolkien intended. His publisher made him split his work into three separate novels.

I won't say that the movies were flawless, either as an adaptation or has a standalone work. Yes, there was inevitably a good deal of work to make Jackson's movie mainstream, but it didn't suffer as horribly as most people think.

To give an idea to those who didn't read the Lord of the Rings, the first book goes from Bilbo's party, to Frodo's journey through the shire, ending at the bridge before Rivendale. That's a movie in itself.

Each book should be at least 2 hours, (maybe 3 hours), for a grand epic total of at least 12 hours, but more than likely longer. That would not only be a really faithful retelling but really amazing. It would probably take 2 or more years to film though.

Imagine if all the star wars films, (both trilogies) were crammed into 3 films. I think the films, (particularly the dismal prequels) would be much much worse.


(Reply to this)
crudebob
crudebob writes:
on Oct 05 2007 05:10 PM

In reply to this comment (#1169794)
You are a moron walkingdead09.

(Reply to this)
walkingdead09
walkingdead09 writes:
on Oct 05 2007 06:54 PM

Sorry buddy, I know you probably sleep in your middle earth garb and your pointy ears, but i tried to watch the movies, but man they are awful. Just not a fan. Only thing I like from jackson is Meet the feebles.

JD


(Reply to this)
photosuperstar
photosuperstar writes:
on Oct 05 2007 07:26 PM

In reply to this comment (#1169802)
Thanks, I was shooting for the idck of the day award!!

(Reply to this)
Absurdity
Absurdity writes:
on Oct 05 2007 10:21 PM

Understandable that not everyone likes the Lord of the Rings, but if you think peter jackson is a bad director, I'm afraid you haven't perused his whole library. Go out to blockbuster and rent Dead Alive. Easily one of the best movies ever. Proof of the oscar's negligence.

P.S. Walkingdead, it's in the same vein of humor as Meet the Feebles but is more consistantly funny.


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

The Hobbit
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • Hobbit Rolling This June Opens in new window (18)
  • Casting Call for The Hobbit Released Opens in new window (21)
  • Tobey Maguire Refutes Hobbit Rumors Opens in new window (9)
  • Tobey Maguire Rumored for The Hobbit Opens in new window (42)
  • Peter Jackson Reveals Which LotR Characters Will Return for The Hobbit Opens in new window (26)
  • Peter Jackson Talks Hobbit, LotR Blu-ray Opens in new window (20)
  • No Hobbit Until 2012? Opens in new window (22)
  • The Hobbit Filming Pushed Back Opens in new window (12)
  • Ian McKellen Is Excited About The Hobbit Opens in new window (26)
  • Four Franchises Ready to Go Fourth Opens in new window (48)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Avatar Continues Its Run In 2010 (231)
  • Awards Tour: 2010 People's Choice Awards Winners! (228)
  • Rotten Tomatoes Is Joining Forces With Flixster! (52)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Annual Ketchup Edition (37)
  • Awards Tour: The Hurt Locker Wins Big At National Society of Film Critics Awards (37)
  • Awards Tour: Directors Guild Association Announces Nominees (32)
  • Friday Harvest: Eclipse, Robin Hood, and more! (31)
  • Awards Tour: Producers Guild Announces Nominees (25)
  • Total Recall: Amy Adams' Best Movies (21)
  • Critics Consensus: Daybreakers Has Bite (15)

Latest News

  • Critics Consensus: Daybreakers Has Bite (15)
  • Awards Tour: Directors Guild Association Announces Nominees (32)
  • RT on DVD: Funny People, Pelham 123, The Soloist (0)
  • Awards Tour: 2010 People's Choice Awards Winners! (228)
  • Total Recall: Amy Adams' Best Movies (21)
  • Awards Tour: Producers Guild Announces Nominees (25)
  • Rotten Tomatoes Is Joining Forces With Flixster! (52)
  • Seth Rogen talks Funny People (0)
  • Win Funny People on DVD (0)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Avatar Continues Its Run In 2010 (231)

Latest Interviews

  • Five Favorite Films With Peter Jackson (76)
  • Robert Downey Jr. talks Sherlock Holmes & Iron Man 2 - RT Interview (22)
  • Director Ruben Fleischer Talks Zombieland (2)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (17)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (12)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (24)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (8)
  • RT on DVD: Wassup, Bruno (3)
  • Scott Hicks Talks The Boys Are Back (0)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (16)

Latest Features

  • RT on DVD: Funny People, Pelham 123, The Soloist (0)
  • RT on DVD: District 9, Ponyo, Young Victoria (1)
  • RT on DVD: Sam Raimi Drags Us To Hell... (2)
  • RT's Best of the Decade! (195)
  • Our Favourite Films of 2009 (13)
  • Five Favorite Films With Peter Jackson (76)
  • RT on DVD: Inglourious Basterds, Year One, The Ugly Truth (2)
  • The Effects of Where the Wild Things Are (37)
  • The Gimmicks That Changed Cinema: Part 2 (8)
  • RT on DVD: The War Begins in Terminator Salvation (2)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo
About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Press | Careers
IGN | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | Direct2Drive | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Game Sites | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | GIGA.DE | What They Play | Battlefield Heroes
By continuing past this page, and by your continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2010, IGN Entertainment, Inc. | Support | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! RSS Feeds
IGN’s enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA.
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.