RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Check out the new RT Community
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
RT News / Features / Cannes Film Festival 2008
Cannes 2008: Review - Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
The early RT verdict on the fourth chapter.
by Joe Utichi | May 18, 2008
Discuss Article
After more than a year of hoping and praying that Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull would do right by fans of the archaeological franchise, the film's first screening in Cannes confirms the worst. There's a brilliant Indy film buried somewhere within, but Star Wars syndrome has stuck and Steven Spielberg and George Lucas just couldn't resist dipping into their box of computer-generated magic.

Quite aside from a plot torn literally from outer space - we won't go into too much detail save to say that alien visitation plays its part- where this film struggles to find its feet is in moments in which its characters are forced to tackle increasingly implausible CG set pieces. When the first of these moments is as outrageous as it is, you have to worry where the film plans to go next.

And that's the real issue: there's never any true sense of peril. There are only a couple of actual fistfights in the movie and Ford is the ultimate actor when it comes to taking a punch and making you believe it. Forcing him to constantly outrun computer just doesn't feel true o the character.

Too much reverence for the previous movies and for new technologies probably combined to cause the problem -- everything feels like a movie; the sets look rickety, the lighting harsh. The original films suffered the same problem occasionally, but they were of their time and totally plausible in spite of it. This would be OK if the CG didn't push too far, but it does so clearly in an attempt to live up to the summer blockbusters of now.

Despite these issue, there's still is a lot to love. From the moment Ford picks up the Fedora and you see his silhouette as he puts it on you know you're in familiar company and he delights in taking on the mantle of the older Dr. Jones. This is the film's greatest strength; there are a couple of jokes about his age, but nothing approaching Lethal Weapon levels, and you very quickly remember that Indy has never been the willing action hero -- Ford's reluctance is given a whole new angle.

But Indy is probably the only wholly realised character. Disappointingly no one else is really given a chance to shine. Ray Winstone swaps sides far too regularly, John Hurt and Jim Broadbent are underused and Cate Blanchett has so precious little to do you barely remember her as the credits roll.

The verbal arguments between Indy and Karen Allen's Marion Ravenwood are right back to par, though, and the worst kept secret in Hollywood about Shia LaBeouf's character sets him up as a third sparring partner. Unfortunately, Mutt really shouldn't be in the film - there's not enough characterisation to really justify his place and you wonder if he wasn't included purely to satisfy one of the film's - admittedly very humorous, running gags.

This isn't as bad as Phantom Menace, and not as much of a disaster as it could so easily have been. You get the impression that Spielberg and Lucas did their best to take on board the lessons of the Star Wars prequels, and you are left in no doubt that everyone involved desperately wanted preserve the quality of the franchise.

Related Items
Movie: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-20 of 50 posts) | Reply
Maase
Maase writes:
on May 18 2008 09:10 AM

B'uh, that's a shame.

I'l still see it tough, i didn't see yet the other Indiana Jones movies, maybe this will be a good movie as a Solo Movie and not as an Indiana Jones movie :)


(Reply to this)
Xavier Telouran
Xavier Telouran writes:
on May 18 2008 09:14 AM

So for this reviewer it was mostly a Kindom of the Crystal Dulls?

Sorry, had to get it out there so I could claim "shenanigans" when all the papers started using it...


(Reply to this)
blinkybrown
blinkybrown writes:
on May 18 2008 09:19 AM

Good thing I think Cannes is an over-pretentious (though not as bad as sundance) excuse for slamming regular film with a focus on only enjoying experimental art. They've often hated good movies and loved bad movies, so I'm still not worried. Plus, even a bad Indy movie is a good movie...because it's Indy.

(Reply to this)
RottenRob
RottenRob writes:
on May 18 2008 09:26 AM

I tried not to judge the movie too much by its previews, but it's strange how this review seems to exactly reflect my impressions from the trailers. Of course I'll still see it and probably have fun.

Heck, I still think Phantom Menace is fun despite its problems.

Heck, indeed.


(Reply to this)
bwozar07
bwozar07 writes:
on May 18 2008 09:35 AM

I would comment that there are some more pleasant reviews of Indy coming out, McCarthy at Variety for instance

http://www.variety.com/VE1117937176.html


(Reply to this)
Some guy you dont know
Some guy you dont know writes:
on May 18 2008 09:41 AM

Phantom Menace kicked *** so I'm not going to listen to this review.

(Reply to this)
jokerboy1991
jokerboy1991 writes:
on May 18 2008 10:09 AM

IDK... I still think its going to be great. Some critics im sure like some viewers wanted it to be bad.

(Reply to this)
jokerboy1991
jokerboy1991 writes:
on May 18 2008 10:13 AM

I think this will still get a positive RT meter. These are just a few reviews there basing this story on im sure.

(Reply to this)
jeremyd4
jeremyd4 writes:
on May 18 2008 10:18 AM

I'm finding this review very hard to make sense of..
"it's not as much of a disaster as it could so easily have been". Huh? So it was a disaster then, just not a very big one??? You sure didn't say anything too damning about the film though - just too much CGI.. and the other stars didn't get the chance to shine (I think it should all be about Indy anyway).


(Reply to this)
salsafish
salsafish writes:
on May 18 2008 10:18 AM

Can we use the word "Zeitgeist" without being pretentious?

You know without seeing it that this movie has one foot in the 80s, and one in 2008. It's going to have "flaws" since it's trying to do a bunch of things at once. What matters is that it's going to be fun to watch, and that's the real point.


(Reply to this)
blattman
blattman writes:
on May 18 2008 10:47 AM

Anyone who didn't see all the CGI in the first trailer was blind. You go for the adventure, to lose yourself for a couple of hours in his world, and I don't want it too real. I'm still pretty sure the boulder from the first movie wasn't a real threat to Harrison Ford anymore then the cgi ones are in this pic. Jeesh!

(Reply to this)
mrshock13
mrshock13 writes:
on May 18 2008 10:56 AM

In reply to this comment (#1739304)
Salsafish, you pretty much have it, this movie exists for the pure entertainment value for all the fans who have seen and loved the previous indy movies. Regardless of what reviewers will say, people will go see this movie, and probably love it, because for the most part they aren't a bunch of pretentious pricks that think that this movie isn't good because there is TOO much action...how that is in an ACTION film, much less an INDY film, I will never understand. Can't wait to see it, it's gonna be great!

(Reply to this)
Timbo0075
Timbo0075 writes:
on May 18 2008 11:15 AM

this is rubbish, I thrust Empireonline.com, they warned us that more mixed reviews would come out like this but to ignore them. They said it was fun so I'm gonna believe them. Not this *** who wrote this

(Reply to this)
The Federal Farmer
The Federal Farmer writes:
on May 18 2008 11:17 AM

In reply to this comment (#1739231)
Just echoing blinkybrown. As someone who's worked Sundance for many years, it's pretty obvious when critics reach a little too deep when making their reviews. I have no idea why on earth Indy premiered at Cannes. No doubt there were anti-American sentiments abounding, full of hatred towards Spielberg, Lucas, and everything with a budget over $100. If it's anything like Sundance, the negative reaction means it's probably a good movie, since so many of those festival goers are caught up in acting like movie bourgeoise, simply because they've seen a few non-mainstream flicks. Even the bad reviews make this sound great - full of action, all the stuff of the old movies. And, hey, when you can impress a hard-nosed critic like Emmanuel Levy, you're doing just fine.

(Reply to this)
smitty112485
smitty112485 writes:
on May 18 2008 11:22 AM

What I'm not clear on... is this one guy's opinion or is it a consensus?

Right now, it has a 63% Tomatometer, and the good reviews are clearly contradicting the bad ones. It's not like most films where the bad reviews and good reviews share criticisms, but this is one where one person is saying "Cate Blanchett is forgettable" and another is saying "She's good enough to be a Bond Villain". It's crazy. And knowing how pretentious the Cannes crowd have been in the past (The Da Vinci Code was disappointing, but their reaction to it was a bit much), they're not exactly the most reliable source when it comes to what's great. Didn't Babel win the Palme d'Or one year?


(Reply to this)
just a fan
just a fan writes:
on May 18 2008 11:27 AM

Going to the movies is like meeting new people. You don't always understand them, may not like them initially or later but it is an experience. Seeing a franchise film like Indy or even X Files is like a reunion with some old friends you may not like everything about them but they are familiar and you have some common experiences good and bad. I want to have have fun, be moved, infuriated, scared out my pants or laugh and be entertained. Ironman was a new found "friend" despite its flaws, Young at Heart was a delight and whatever Indy is or isn't I'm sure I'll have some fun in the dark with some old friends.

(Reply to this)
monkeybrow
monkeybrow writes:
on May 18 2008 11:33 AM

interesting that Variety and Time's reviews are quite positive compared to this...

(Reply to this)
cypress550
cypress550 writes:
on May 18 2008 12:38 PM

for the most part i dont listen to reviewers anyway i have to see it first to make an opinion not go off somebody elses. also ive heard alot of good reviews too so this doesnt worry me at all.

(Reply to this)
sunsaz
sunsaz writes:
on May 18 2008 01:06 PM

IMO, this review really doesn't say if it was any good or not. Maybe it's because I'm reading it with a headache, but this appears more cryptic than the plot itself. Oh well, I can wait a couple more days for the other reviews to come in.

And I'm still going to see it anyways, so that'll be the best possible review.


(Reply to this)
Bloody Mathias
Bloody Mathias writes:
on May 18 2008 01:07 PM

Just as i thought, mixed reviews.

Some calling this a travesty to the trilogy others sayings they had a blast.

Oh well, bring on July 18. :D


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2 3
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

Cannes Film Festival 2008
  • Pictures
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • Cannes 2008: Review - Che (4)
  • Cannes 2008: RT Meets Mike Tyson (11)
  • Cannes 2008: Terminator 4 Producers Talk (12)
  • Cannes 2008: Review - Dance of the Dead (10)
  • Cannes 2008: Pegg Loses Friends and Alienates People (4)
  • Cannes 2008: Simon Pegg on His New Project (12)
  • Cannes 2008: Spike Lee's Next Project (6)
  • Cannes 2008: Review - Roman Polanski: Wanted & Desired (19)
  • Cannes 2008: Review - Changeling (22)
  • Cannes 2008: Review - The Mutant Chronicles (6)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Avatar Continues Its Run In 2010 (230)
  • Awards Tour: 2010 People's Choice Awards Winners! (94)
  • Rotten Tomatoes Is Joining Forces With Flixster! (50)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Annual Ketchup Edition (37)
  • Awards Tour: The Hurt Locker Wins Big At National Society of Film Critics Awards (37)
  • Five Favorites of the Five Favorite Films of 2009 (36)
  • Friday Harvest: Eclipse, Robin Hood, and more! (31)
  • Awards Tour: Producers Guild Announces Nominees (25)
  • Total Recall: Amy Adams' Best Movies (15)
  • RT on DVD: District 9, Ponyo, Young Victoria (1)

Latest News

  • Awards Tour: 2010 People's Choice Awards Winners! (94)
  • Total Recall: Amy Adams' Best Movies (15)
  • Awards Tour: Producers Guild Announces Nominees (25)
  • Rotten Tomatoes Is Joining Forces With Flixster! (50)
  • Seth Rogen talks Funny People (0)
  • Win Funny People on DVD (0)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Avatar Continues Its Run In 2010 (230)
  • Awards Tour: The Hurt Locker Wins Big At National Society of Film Critics Awards (37)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Annual Ketchup Edition (37)
  • Friday Harvest: Eclipse, Robin Hood, and more! (31)

Latest Interviews

  • Five Favorite Films With Peter Jackson (76)
  • Robert Downey Jr. talks Sherlock Holmes & Iron Man 2 - RT Interview (22)
  • Director Ruben Fleischer Talks Zombieland (2)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (17)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (12)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (24)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (8)
  • RT on DVD: Wassup, Bruno (3)
  • Scott Hicks Talks The Boys Are Back (0)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (16)

Latest Features

  • RT on DVD: District 9, Ponyo, Young Victoria (1)
  • RT on DVD: Sam Raimi Drags Us To Hell... (2)
  • RT's Best of the Decade! (192)
  • Our Favourite Films of 2009 (13)
  • Five Favorite Films With Peter Jackson (76)
  • RT on DVD: Inglourious Basterds, Year One, The Ugly Truth (2)
  • The Effects of Where the Wild Things Are (37)
  • The Gimmicks That Changed Cinema: Part 2 (8)
  • RT on DVD: The War Begins in Terminator Salvation (2)
  • The Gimmicks That Changed Cinema: Part 1 (37)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo
About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Press | Careers
IGN | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | Direct2Drive | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Game Sites | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | GIGA.DE | What They Play | Battlefield Heroes
By continuing past this page, and by your continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2010, IGN Entertainment, Inc. | Support | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! RSS Feeds
IGN’s enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA.
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.