"What propels Jason [Statham] is even more extreme than the drug that he took [in the first Crank]," said Rosenberg.
Rosenberg plans to bring the sequel in under relatively the same budget, except of course for certain talent. "We had to pay Jason more and the instructors more and so forth, but we generally don't do that where the sequel becomes so much bigger and less likely to be successful. No, the style will be the same, the shooting schedule is within two to three days of the [first] one."
This time, the filmmakers will likely not write themselves into a corner by re-killing Chev at the end. Rosenberg indicates Crank could also be a trilogy. "We'll see. It leaves off where that's possible. If the public embraces it, I think it's going to be bigger than the first one."
Related Items
| Celeb: | Tom Rosenberg |
| Jason Statham |
|
jasperoosterveld writes: on Jan 18 2008 01:36 AM "as the script was finished before the writer's strike" As if "movies" like this need a script... (Reply to this) |
|
yankeesrule587 writes: on Jan 18 2008 01:41 AM ok i get the "electric heart" thing, but i wonder how theyre gonna explain how he survived a 200 to 300 or better fall... should be interesting (Reply to this) |
|
Ruckas356 writes: on Jan 18 2008 01:59 AM He had sex in the street to keep his heart going before so they better have better ideas in the second one. (Reply to this) |
|
HairyHartounian writes: on Jan 18 2008 03:10 AM 'Crank' was a no-frills adrenaline rush of a movie. It's plot being rooted solely in being as adrenal as possible, it should at least be treated and appreciated as such. Like "Shoot 'Em Up." Any misanthropic naysayers should quit their jawjacking and at least appreciate a decently crafted popcorn flick when it's presented. At very least it'll be a nice manly alternative to the inevitable 'Alvin and the Chipmunks' sequel. I weep for mankind. (Reply to this) |
|
Gimy writes: on Jan 18 2008 05:23 AM why did you idiots even go see the film? honestly?? its called Crank, not Love Poems of Yesteryear. its pure action, pure fun...pure "DON'T THINK" entertainment. go read a book ya nerds. i think the script was finished because the entire thing is basically one paragraph. "chev enters room...kicks some 2ss. chev leaves room, kicks more 2ss. chev sees hot 2ss...gets in her 2ss...then smacks said 2ss...then leaves building to kick 2ss in street. end of scene". its basically stathom kicking the crap out of everybody. its not going to be any better, scriptwise, so don't bother if you didn't like the first. its not shakespeare people. i actually like this kinda movie. at least you know going in you won't be that disappointed because you know xactly what you're going to see (Reply to this) |
|
John Z. Delorean writes: on Jan 18 2008 06:46 AM We need more Cranks and Shoot 'Em Ups and Running Scared type flicks. I love good dialogue and great stories but sometimes I need straight up mindless action that is actually done well. These are actually fun movies unlike any Steven Seagal or Jet Li teaming with DMX or whatever wack rapper they're casting these days. Don't talk crap about the plot just go watch Pride and Prejudice and Atonement and let us have our fun. (Reply to this) |
|
OperaGhost21 writes: on Jan 18 2008 06:52 AM I agree with the last three posters. I really enjoyed Crank because I knew that it was mindless action and fun, not Oscar worthy acting and writing. I hope Crank 2 delivers as much as the first one did. (Reply to this) |
|
Crenshaw writes: on Jan 18 2008 07:00 AM Clank...Ratchet. Good one! ;-) (Reply to this) |
|
dOiNk writes: on Jan 18 2008 08:20 AM can't wait... loved crank, and shoot em up rocked. these movies are great and definitely appreciated. mindless action with tons of humor works for me (Reply to this) |
|
Bear45 writes: on Jan 18 2008 08:33 AM HATED Crank. LOVED Shoot 'Em Up. So I guess I'm somewhere in between. (Reply to this) |
|
gunslingR writes: on Jan 18 2008 09:03 AM loved crank. loved shoot em up. ... loved atonement? please don't even try to compare them... that's like saying "you know, i love women, but i f'ing can't stand pineapples" there two entirely different concepts and can both be appreciated by mature audiences who intentionally are looking for certain aspects of a film to entertain them. that being said, looking forward to this one as well (Reply to this) |
|
jimtrots writes: on Jan 18 2008 09:38 AM I have seen a lot of bad movies, but Crank maybe one of the worst that I've seen in the theater. I walked out after he has sex in the street with Amy Smart(which probably ruined her career). Jason Statham is great as a supporting character; like in Snatch and The Italian Job, but he can't carry a movie. (Reply to this) |
|
dahluzz writes: on Jan 18 2008 09:40 AM Crank 2 Ratchets Up Style Rosenberg: "No, the style will be the same." um... (Reply to this) |
|
Gimy writes: on Jan 18 2008 01:39 PM jimmytrots...amy smart's career ruined? haha. thats hilarious. her career started with Varsity Blues and ended with Road Trip. she had a brief peak back into the light with Scrubs but thats 'bout it. no way this flick "ruined" her career. its a shame though...she's pretty cute (Reply to this) |
|
remyrem12 writes: on Jan 18 2008 11:04 PM Crank was a great 'bad movie' and I mean that in the best way possible. (Reply to this) |
|
Poor_Frisco writes: on Jan 19 2008 12:42 AM Crank is comfortably my least favorite movie of all time i can't wait to never see the sequel (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jan 19 2008 04:55 AM I didn't mind the action in Crank it was the piss poor acting and blatantly unlikeable characters I didn't care for. Seriously is there a more uncomfortable actor to watch than Dwight Yoakam? That guys just screams Late night sneaky uncle ugggghhhh, (Reply to this) |
|
Matanuki writes: on Jan 19 2008 07:31 AM I was worried at first when my friends, in full on raving mad enthusiasm style, said "man, you gotta see it! It's the ultimate testosterone flick!" This coming from the same variety of friends who didn't care much for Tony Jaa's Protector, I was curious to see what their idea of "ultimate testosterone flick" was. So I planted for a sitting of Crank. To be sure, I thought it was incredibly stupid from the word "go". But it was fun and, as some have called it, "mindless entertainment done well". It's like the question of eating healthy. You wanna keep it as clean as possible, to honor the body, but sometimes you just gotta have a little junk food. That was Crank for me. Pure junk, a guilty pleasure of absolutely no nutritional value. Problem is, watching it again is like binging. And endorsing a sequel, considering the way its predecessor ended, well, is pretty much tantamount to having yet another slice of that goddamn pizza that you're likely to regret first thing in the morning. lol. In other words, count me in! Something along the lines of Atonement will be my obligatory punishment jog. (Reply to this) |
|
smi1ey writes: on Jan 19 2008 11:33 AM i loved the first movie. it cracks me up how people actually took it seriously. the movie was meant to be corny, funny, and fast paced. it delivered 100% on that. i am looking forward to seeing how they bring him back from the dead, and will definitely be seeing this one! (Reply to this) |
|
Brad 3000 writes: on Jan 19 2008 10:32 PM In reply to this comment (#1487392) No, it's not like saying that at all. I understand that you are trying to be clever and using hyperbole, but it just doesn't bear up under scrutiny. A woman is a sentient being and a Pineapple is a fruit, whereas Crank, Shoot em Up and Atonement are all movies. It's more like saying "I love blond cheerleaders but I hate emo librarian girls." By the way, I haven't seen Atonement yet, but I thought Shoot em Up was just passable and Crank was nauseatingly bad. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |






