George A. Romero on Diary of the Dead: The RT Interview
Do you think they might run into the mall or the science lab?
GR: No, I don't think so. No. It's simultaneous, so they could, but that's not the way I would want to go with it. The biggest thing that we didn't touch on was the idea that somebody, anybody, any lunatic could throw up a blog and all of a sudden he's got 50 people following him. We didn't really touch on that so much and that's a direction that I'd like to go with, the idea of people developing tribes just by preaching to the converted. People that tune into Rush Limbaugh know what he's going to say and already agree. That's what happens I think with these columnists.
It's interesting, the blogs and videos they find in Diary are actually helpful. People who have fought zombies share the information about how to destroy their brains.
GR: Not so much the blogs. They get that information from police radio broadcasts. That's really where that info comes from. Mainstream media is sort of denying it, and then when it comes down to the blogs, that's what I mean. We haven't gone into that because they're the ones who are sending it out without a lot of information. There's also something there. All they know is what happened to them and yet they're trying to put out this film and the main character, Jason, is so obsessed with doing it that he loses sight of reality, loses sight of his own survival and winds up perishing because of that. I don't think they get a lot of accurate information, certainly not off the net.

George A. Romero's Diary of the Dead
Was the scene where electrocuting the zombie doesn't work an answer to the Return of the Living Dead spinoff franchise, that claimed electricity would kill them for good?
GR: No. Not at all. It was an idea that came to me in the shower. Wouldn't that be cool if she tries this and it oughta' fry her but it doesn't, so she comes back.
You start to explore how other cultures are responding to this. We see video from Japan and they even go through Amish country. What other cultures would you like to explore in this scenario?
GR: I don't know but it's a good idea. I really haven't thought much about that. We were just trying to show that it's worldwide. That's all.
Since each film takes a different approach, what are the must-have elements in one of your zombie movies?
GR: Zombies! No, in fact, I could do away with the zombies. I don't give a s**t. The stories have nothing to do with the zombies. The zombies might be a hurricane. They might be any disaster that comes along, but zombies are my ticket to ride in a certain way.
But all the films have scenes where they barricade, where they gather supplies, where they start in-fighting.
GR: That recurs because it's human argument, right? It's people not knowing exactly what to do and just getting caught up in arguing about ridiculous stuff instead of trying to really directly address the problem. I don't think it's so much that. The zombies are the ticket to ride. These are zombie movies so you have to have zombies. You have to figure out a cool way to get rid of the zombies, to kill them off, lose the brain somehow. That's really the only element. The rest of it is they're stories. They're stories about people.

George A. Romero's Diary of the Dead
Does Diary even focus more on the human story and less on the zombie element than the other films?
GR: I don't know that it necessarily does. Probably certainly not less than Night, but the story's more obvious and the zombie sequences, particularly the gore sequences, go by very quickly because they're shot subjectively by these people that are sort of standing back a little bit. Whereas the tendency when you're doing it objectively is to go in for close up and do product shots on the gore. That just tends to stretch it out. I think pound for pound, it's equal at least to, maybe not all of the films. Maybe Dawn and Day went a little further but it's just that it goes by so quickly I think, because we're just looking at it from over here. We're not going in and studying it and taking five minutes to kill that zombie off.
How do you come up with new ways to dispose of the brain?
GR: You take a shower. I don't know, man, it just comes to you.
You don't sing. You think of zombie kills.
GR: I do. Of course I do. I'm already just faced with the idea of possibly having to do another sequel, and knowing that someday I probably will do another zombie movie, already the first thing you start to do is figure out new ways to dispose of these guys. It's tough to come up with stuff.
It's always been interesting to me that the first film was Night of the LIVING Dead, but then it was always …of the Dead. Aren't they still living dead?
GR: Yes, they are. It's not my fault. Don't ask me. I don't make up the titles. The funny thing is, my partner at the time when I made Dawn of the Dead and Day of the Dead didn't want to get involved with any sort of litigation, so he shortened it to "of the dead." Now anybody that wants to hire me to make a movie, it has to be "of the dead," Something of the Dead.
You said you didn't know where to go with the Land of the Dead thread, but Land suggested there might be uncontaminated areas he was heading off to. Wouldn't that be a place to explore?
GR: That's actually the way I'm sort of going. You want to just get somewhere where there's at least less turmoil, someplace a little less civilized where at least if there is a conflict, it's going to be smaller and maybe more controlled. But yeah, that's obviously the way I was going and that's what I was doing with Land because there was a hell of a lot of talk while we were shooting Land that we'll do a sequel to this right away too. It's the obvious thing to do. If I was one of those guys, I'd say, "Let's go to the Yukon, man."
GR: No, I don't think so. No. It's simultaneous, so they could, but that's not the way I would want to go with it. The biggest thing that we didn't touch on was the idea that somebody, anybody, any lunatic could throw up a blog and all of a sudden he's got 50 people following him. We didn't really touch on that so much and that's a direction that I'd like to go with, the idea of people developing tribes just by preaching to the converted. People that tune into Rush Limbaugh know what he's going to say and already agree. That's what happens I think with these columnists.
It's interesting, the blogs and videos they find in Diary are actually helpful. People who have fought zombies share the information about how to destroy their brains.
GR: Not so much the blogs. They get that information from police radio broadcasts. That's really where that info comes from. Mainstream media is sort of denying it, and then when it comes down to the blogs, that's what I mean. We haven't gone into that because they're the ones who are sending it out without a lot of information. There's also something there. All they know is what happened to them and yet they're trying to put out this film and the main character, Jason, is so obsessed with doing it that he loses sight of reality, loses sight of his own survival and winds up perishing because of that. I don't think they get a lot of accurate information, certainly not off the net.

George A. Romero's Diary of the Dead
Was the scene where electrocuting the zombie doesn't work an answer to the Return of the Living Dead spinoff franchise, that claimed electricity would kill them for good?
GR: No. Not at all. It was an idea that came to me in the shower. Wouldn't that be cool if she tries this and it oughta' fry her but it doesn't, so she comes back.
You start to explore how other cultures are responding to this. We see video from Japan and they even go through Amish country. What other cultures would you like to explore in this scenario?
GR: I don't know but it's a good idea. I really haven't thought much about that. We were just trying to show that it's worldwide. That's all.
Since each film takes a different approach, what are the must-have elements in one of your zombie movies?
GR: Zombies! No, in fact, I could do away with the zombies. I don't give a s**t. The stories have nothing to do with the zombies. The zombies might be a hurricane. They might be any disaster that comes along, but zombies are my ticket to ride in a certain way.
But all the films have scenes where they barricade, where they gather supplies, where they start in-fighting.
GR: That recurs because it's human argument, right? It's people not knowing exactly what to do and just getting caught up in arguing about ridiculous stuff instead of trying to really directly address the problem. I don't think it's so much that. The zombies are the ticket to ride. These are zombie movies so you have to have zombies. You have to figure out a cool way to get rid of the zombies, to kill them off, lose the brain somehow. That's really the only element. The rest of it is they're stories. They're stories about people.

George A. Romero's Diary of the Dead
Does Diary even focus more on the human story and less on the zombie element than the other films?
GR: I don't know that it necessarily does. Probably certainly not less than Night, but the story's more obvious and the zombie sequences, particularly the gore sequences, go by very quickly because they're shot subjectively by these people that are sort of standing back a little bit. Whereas the tendency when you're doing it objectively is to go in for close up and do product shots on the gore. That just tends to stretch it out. I think pound for pound, it's equal at least to, maybe not all of the films. Maybe Dawn and Day went a little further but it's just that it goes by so quickly I think, because we're just looking at it from over here. We're not going in and studying it and taking five minutes to kill that zombie off.
How do you come up with new ways to dispose of the brain?
GR: You take a shower. I don't know, man, it just comes to you.
You don't sing. You think of zombie kills.
GR: I do. Of course I do. I'm already just faced with the idea of possibly having to do another sequel, and knowing that someday I probably will do another zombie movie, already the first thing you start to do is figure out new ways to dispose of these guys. It's tough to come up with stuff.
It's always been interesting to me that the first film was Night of the LIVING Dead, but then it was always …of the Dead. Aren't they still living dead?
GR: Yes, they are. It's not my fault. Don't ask me. I don't make up the titles. The funny thing is, my partner at the time when I made Dawn of the Dead and Day of the Dead didn't want to get involved with any sort of litigation, so he shortened it to "of the dead." Now anybody that wants to hire me to make a movie, it has to be "of the dead," Something of the Dead.
You said you didn't know where to go with the Land of the Dead thread, but Land suggested there might be uncontaminated areas he was heading off to. Wouldn't that be a place to explore?
GR: That's actually the way I'm sort of going. You want to just get somewhere where there's at least less turmoil, someplace a little less civilized where at least if there is a conflict, it's going to be smaller and maybe more controlled. But yeah, that's obviously the way I was going and that's what I was doing with Land because there was a hell of a lot of talk while we were shooting Land that we'll do a sequel to this right away too. It's the obvious thing to do. If I was one of those guys, I'd say, "Let's go to the Yukon, man."
|
Young Turk writes: on Feb 15 2008 05:45 PM I really want to see this. (Reply to this) |
|
Some guy you dont know writes: on Feb 15 2008 06:21 PM Romero is king. (Reply to this) |
|
jdale writes: on Feb 15 2008 08:42 PM I really lost faith in this series after Land. But I'm interested. (Reply to this) |
|
jdale writes: on Feb 15 2008 08:42 PM I really lost faith in this series after Land. But I'm interested. (Reply to this) |
|
Ruckas356 writes: on Feb 15 2008 08:50 PM Georg A is the F#CKIN MAN (Reply to this) |
|
Product_of_You writes: on Feb 15 2008 09:01 PM Thats weird; I thought Land was his best film. Maybe Dawn was just a bit better, but they're on equal footing more likely. I thought Day of the Dead was terrible, and Night wasn't very good. (Reply to this) |
|
reavus4983 writes: on Feb 16 2008 07:22 AM Night is my favorite, followed by Land. Dawn to me got too goofy with all the things making fun of consumerism. Night is so original and has so many creepy moments in it (especially the graveyard scene), and since Diary is his first independent since Night I really hope they compare again in their zombie-creepiness factor. Too bad it's a limited release. (Reply to this) |
|
jarek writes: on Feb 16 2008 07:32 AM Diary is a great flick. (Reply to this) |
|
ocmurer writes: on Feb 16 2008 10:04 AM Night of the Living Dead was goofy, because, duh, it's from the sixties. But it was still a very good movie. Dawn of the Dead was even better, but again, a little goofy. Day of the Dead was just incredibly stupid. And I forgot to see Land of the Dead. But I like the premise for Diary of the Dead (being a film student myself) and I want it to freaking open in a theater near me. (Reply to this) |
|
punktuate writes: on Feb 16 2008 02:32 PM If it says Romero on it....it will be seen by me all of his movies kick *** no matter if it's actually about consumerism or whatever they are badass visually and just done so intelligently; Romero kicks more *** than a 12 year old a.d.d. kid at the Grand Canyon (Reply to this) |
|
knowingtoast85 writes: on Feb 16 2008 09:02 PM Oh God I feel so bad saying this. But Diary is the worst piece of **** I have seen in a long time, and that's coming from a huge fan of Night and Dawn. The movie could have been about 30% better without the incredibly pandering, didactic narration. As far as the nature of the narrative goes, I swear "Cloverfield" handled it far better, even with all its flaws. The camera movement in "Diary" won't make anyone sick though, just the script. I didn't want it to be this way any more than anyone else, but man what a ****burger. (Reply to this) |
|
Some guy you dont know writes: on Feb 16 2008 09:42 PM Diary of the Dead is great. Don't listen to the stupid people. (Reply to this) |
|
knowingtoast85 writes: on Feb 16 2008 10:23 PM I insist you make your own decision, sure. But I know I won't be alone in this once it opens wider. (Reply to this) |
|
BigEarn writes: on Feb 17 2008 06:13 AM In reply to this comment (#1577715) Bruce Campbell F'in Rules! Romero should try doing a nice romantic comedy. (Reply to this) |
|
theunrulyone writes: on Feb 17 2008 04:07 PM In reply to this comment (#1580461) I understand it had its issues, but I really think Diary is a better movie than Cloverfield. On all levels. One, the acting is better than in Clvoerfield, as were the characters. In Cloverfield I could have cared less about any of them, except maybe Marlena cause she seemed cool (and she was a hottie), but in Diary, I found myself interested in the fates of at least two of the characters. Romero has never been subtle in his commentary, but that's okay. Zombies are not exactly subtle things, after all. The only real issue I had with Diary was the repetition of scenes. I thought the attack at the beginning was cool, but I did not need to see it three or four more times. Still, I really liked this flick and would rank it better than Day and Land. Oh, and for those of you who are curious: YES there is a tone of blood and gore in this flick, but not quites as much as Day, but then, what movie can match Day for straight up goriness? (Reply to this) |
|
sliknik27 writes: on Feb 17 2008 08:41 PM I'm excited for Diary, but Romero did little to woo me with Land. (Reply to this) |
|
darrinsgoodman writes: on Feb 17 2008 09:26 PM as a huge romero fan i have to be like everyone else here and rank them in the order that i like them so here goes: dawn, land, day, & night. i haven't seen "diary" yet but cannot wait till it expands. speaking of - how much is this movie expanding to anyone know? and how soon? (Reply to this) |
|
walkingdead09 writes: on Feb 18 2008 07:28 AM I've never seen any of his movies, is it best to start with the first and work my way through it or what? I'm not a big horror guy, let me know. JD (Reply to this) |
|
reavus4983 writes: on Feb 18 2008 10:57 AM In reply to this comment (#1580522) If you're truly the Evil Dead Bruce Campbell, then I just bought one of your books today. On the subject of this movie, I'm hopefully going into NYC to see it this week, regardless of the bad reviews. Zombie movies are zombie movies, and so they are always in some way good. (Reply to this) |
|
meatcake writes: on Feb 18 2008 11:45 AM Either way, good or bad I plan on seeing it. I am such a fan of George's work, even the non-zombie stuff like "Martin" that I am bound to at least like it. While "Land" was not up to snuff, it was better than "Day" and "Diary" is bound to be leaps and bounds better than the 07 remake of "Day of the Dead" with Nick Cannon which was an utter travesty! (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |







