Click to read the article
Lions for Lambs (2007)
Tomatometer
How does the Tomatometer work ![]()
Reviews Counted:176
Fresh:48
Rotten:128
Average Rating:4.8/10
Consensus: Despite its powerhouse cast, Lions for Lambs feels like a disjointed series of lectures, rather than a sharp narrative, and ends up falling flat.
Runtime: 1 hr 32 mins
Genre: Dramas
US Box Office: $14,971,658
Synopsis: Robert Redford directs and stars in this provocative ode to political activism. Boasting a powerhouse cast that also includes Meryl Streep and Tom Cruise, the film features three storylines... Robert Redford directs and stars in this provocative ode to political activism. Boasting a powerhouse cast that also includes Meryl Streep and Tom Cruise, the film features three storylines centered on the Iraq war. Cruise is Jasper Irving, a rising Republican senator who has summoned Janine Roth (Streep), the head journalist at a large news corporation, to sell her on the government's new military strategy. It's his hope that she in turn will sell the public on the idea. Meanwhile, a history professor (Redford) is trying to convince one of his more promising students to strive to make a difference in the world. Professor Malley believes Todd Hayes (Andrew Garfield) to be a bright young man, and he wants to know why Todd has become so apathetic about his schoolwork, and, after the two banter back and forth about the nature of activism, Malley tells him about two of his former students, Ernest and Arian (Michael Pena and Derek Luke), both of whom are currently serving in Iraq. Unbeknownst to Malley, at that very moment, Ernest and Arian are engaging in the exact military strategy that Senator Irving is discussing with Roth. Their mission has just gone terribly awry, and the men have fallen into enemy territory. So the senator and journalist argue, the professor and student debate, and all the while the wounded soldiers wait desperately for rescue. These disparate storylines slowly build and converge, culminating in a blaring statement about civic responsibility and social conscience. Cruise and Streep are a delight to watch, and their battle of words gives the most heat to the film. As one might expect, it casts an extremely critical eye at the current state of American politics. However, it veers toward hope, and a call to action. Redford, himself a longtime activist, appears to be sending an open letter to America: turn off the celebrity coverage and get involved. [More]
Starring: Tom Cruise, Meryl Streep, Robert Redford, Michael Peña
Starring: Tom Cruise, Meryl Streep, Robert Redford, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield, Derek Luke, Peter Berg
Director: Robert Redford
Director: Robert Redford
Screenwriter: Matthew Michael Carnahan
Producer: Robert Redford, Matthew Michael Carnahan, Andrew Hauptman, Tracy Falco
Composer: Mark Isham
Studio: MGM/UA
Reviews for Lions for Lambs
A passionate plea for honesty, courage and standing up for what you believe in, Lions for Lambs is a powder keg of a film. It's a film to debate and discuss
there's a meek little ending that's more of a feeble whimper than a roar.
This is an unapologetically liberal film. Does it preach to the choir? Absolutely. My own left-leaning views being what they are, I liked it on those terms, even as I acknowledge that some complexity would have been nice.
Robert Redford (who also directed), Tom Cruise and Meryl Streep might just as well have appeared on-screen for a couple of minutes with signs that said, 'War is bad,' and been done with it. Saves everyone the cost of a ticket.
Lions for Lambs is worth seeing for no other reason that you’ve never seen anything like it before. It’s political theatre that shouldn’t be missed.
A hopelessly stilted political drama that plays like U.S. News & World Report: The Movie.
Robert Redford directs and stars in this ambitious talkathon, which would have been more effective as a radio play.
The new Robert Redford movie, "Lions for Lambs," is nothing if not nostalgic and well-intentioned, and that's part of its problem.
It's too pious to be entertaining, too polite to be convincing and, like a weapon of mass destruction, takes a lot longer to deploy than 45 minutes.
It does not feel good to report that a movie with Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, and Tom Cruise makes the eyelids droop. But that's what Lions for Lambs does.
The movie’s inadequacies exemplify the chief problem it diagnoses -- our society’s reluctance to allot sufficient time for crucial issues to be defined and argued in depth.
For all of its good intentions and clear-eyed idealism, Lions for Lambs is not a movie, it is a political science lecture.
The producers of Lions for Lambs are missing a tremendous marketing opportunity here. They should spell each L word with a Z instead of an L, and use the number 4 in between them. Lionz4lambz would be gangsta to the youth market.
Preachy, worthy and far too wordy, Lions For Lambs doesn't roar so much as bleat. Less a movie than a bungled party political broadcast on behalf on the United Artists party.
Latest News for Lions for Lambs
May 20, 2008:
Carnahan to Write, Direct Crime Drama for Mandate ![]()
Matthew Michael Carnahan has sold his latest script, currently being called Untitled Matt Carnahan Crime Project, to Mandate Pictures. More...
April 07, 2008:
RT on DVD: There Will Be Blood Drinks Lions for Lambs, Dewey Cox's Milkshakes
P. T. Anderson's Oscar-winning oil opus There Will Be Blood hits shelves this week, so if you missed Daniel Day-Lewis' astounding turn as the prospector with a heart as black as... More...
January 30, 2008:
Robert Redford Taking A Walk in the Woods
The best remedy for critical drubbings and box-office indifference -- at least for Robert Redford, whose Lions for Lambs endured both in the final weeks of 2007 -- just might be... More...
January 11, 2008:
Weinsteins Sign Interim Agreement with WGA
Add The Weinstein Company to the list of studios that have signed interim agreements with the Writers Guild of America. More...
More Movies
| Tomatometer Percentage | Movie | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 68% 68% | Sherlock Holmes | 26/12 |
| 40% 40% | The Lovely Bones | 26/12 |
| 100% 100% | The French Kissers | 26/12 |
| 85% 85% | Bright Star | 26/12 |
| 87% 87% | Nowhere Boy | 26/12 |
| 18% 18% | Alvin and the Chipmunk… | 26/12 |
| 10% 10% | Did You Hear About the… | 26/12 |
| 05% 05% | Old Dogs | 26/12 |
What’s Hot On RT
Other News
Sponsored Links
Around The Network
- Lions for Lambs at Rotten Tomatoes
- Lions for Lambs at IGN
- Lions for Lambs at AskMen
Fresh Links
Featured

Last week, Moviefone offered us their worst films of the 2000s. Now see their 40 best!

Movieline gets bravely swept away with the recycled refuse of the 2000s.

Get all the latest movie updates, reviews, interviews and features here.
Competitions

We're giving away a bunch of stuff from the upcoming Squeakquel.



Top Critic


