Matthew Michael Carnahan Explains Lions for Lambs Agenda
Redford-directed drama joins slew of recent Iraq pics.
While many recent films concerning Iraq have taken a political stance, writer Matthew Michael Carnahan sought to do something different. The result, this week's Lions for Lambs, attempts to engage the audience in as non-partisan a debate as you'll find in Hollywood. Whereas Carnahan agrees he doesn't like the idea of war, he tries to make the case for how we can pull out, and why it is important for the American public to be less apathetic towards the war and to do something.
Carnahan is the brother of Narc director Joe Carnahan, to whom he attributes much of his success. Yet it is hard to say Hollywood has treated him like the nepotistic brother; his first film, The Kingdom (which also involved the war on terror) was an $80 million affair directed by Peter Berg, and another political potboiler script, State of Play, is currently filming under director Kevin MacDonald (The Last King of Scotland). Remarkably, Carnahan began writing Lions for Lambs as a stage play before the script fell into the hands of actor-director Robert Redford; the rest, as they say, is history. Soon the busy scribe will pen a big-screen version of The Zebra Murders, about the racially-motivated serial killings in 1970s San Francisco, and collaborate with his brother on an adaptation of James Ellroy's White Jazz.
RT caught up with Carnahan at a roundtable in Los Angeles, touching base on the war on terror, the apathetic nature of youth, and what it means to write a call to action.
How did Robert Redford get attached to direct?
Matthew Michael Carnahan: It was really a Hail Mary. I had heard it was going to Redford and thought it would be wonderful if he even flipped past the title page. And then it came down that he had actually read the whole thing and responded to it. And then I got a message from him and saved it for as long as I could: "Matt, Bob Redford. Let's talk about this."
With The Kingdom and now Lions for Lambs, do you have any more projects involving political drama or the war on terror?
MMC: Nothing right now. Because I really do feel like I'm tapped out. I've said pretty much everything I can say. And I don't even know if at the end of the day it's going to make much of a difference, but just from the sheer fact that I was able to write it down and get it out there, I'll take it. But I am writing a story called the Zebra Murders, a true story in San Francisco about a mass murder that nobody really remembers. It was lost in the Watergate, Vietnam, Zodiac kind of time. And the one I'm supposed to write after that is Guest of the Ayatollah, which is the Bowden book on the Iran hostage crisis. Which is really one of my earliest memories.

And if/when the WGA strike goes?
MMC: Who knows when I'll get to it?
Where did the idea come for Lions for Lambs? From your own indifference or a consciousness of the indifference of others?
MMC: Both! My indifference is the thing that pushed the button. I'm the first to rant and rave about fighting a war on two fronts. I mean that's the last thing you want to do. And here we are fighting on two fronts in a war where the only thing that separates those two fronts is a country (Iran) that might despise us more than the two countries we're fighting in. And yet with all of that I never did anything about it.
I'm a graduate of USC and searching the channels for the SC game, and I past a news report about a Humvee that had flipped into a river. And four or five American soldiers had drowned. I thought, what an awful way to die, when you're at war and you die in what is essentially a traffic accident. And I couldn't get past it fast enough, because God forbid it ruin my experience of watching the game. And it hit me that I'm just as much a part of the problem as everyone I like to point the finger at.
Would you say this movie is a call to action?
MMC: I can't really come up with a better way to put it. A call to action in so far as I wrote this down to see if it would resonate with anybody else.

But then don't you face the same thing that that news report did, with people passing over it?
MMC: Hopefully [when] you get three of the biggest movie stars alive involved, maybe that will trump at least some of that intransigence to go to yet another movie about the middle east and the war on terror.
So then if it's a call to action, what's the "action"?
MMC: To make this war, and the loss of American lives... and the fact that four thousand of my countrymen...the fact that they are dying and it's not a part of our daily lives. That it's not a daily cognition on my part that as we are having this discussion there are people a lot younger than us fighting and dying and going through some of the most terrifying moments imaginable. Basically I just wanted us in our daily lives to become cognizant of that.
What were some of the biggest difficulties you came across in writing?
MMC: The biggest challenge was having originally written it as a stage play. And the more I started to write the military scenes, particularly the helicopter scenes, I realized there's not a stage in existence that could do that justice. I kept visualizing the scene in Rushmore. (Laughs) And I think when you watch it, it still feels like a stage play. And whether or not that's good or bad I don't know. I just didn't know how to get into those subjects without talking.

Was the Todd character [played by Andrew Garfield] anything like you at that age?
MMC: It was completely autobiographical. That Todd character is me in college. I had the idea early on... that I could do less and still get by. I wish I had a teacher that put his foot in my back side. Maybe I would have listened.
Who would you most like to see this movie? Who was it made for?
MMC: Students. And the test screenings we did all over the country at universities went extremely well. And now it's just a matter of, can we get them in there to see it?
What do you think the response of the administration will be?
MMC: Frankly, I don't really care. I don't want to piss people off, just to piss them off. I wanted to talk about these questions in the most balanced way I possibly can.
Lions for Lambs hits theaters Friday.
Related Items
| Movie: | The Kingdom |
| State of Play | |
| White Jazz | |
| Celeb: | Peter Berg |
| Robert Redford | |
| Kevin MacDonald | |
| Joe Carnahan | |
| Matthew Michael Carnahan |
|
arendr writes: on Nov 08 2007 03:36 PM While I admire what's behind this movie, it does look incredibly preachy and heavy-handed based on the trailers I've seen. And I'm not apathetic about the situation in the world. It's just that sometimes these "protest" projects simply don't work. I know I'm judging something I haven't seen yet. But imagine how the rest of the country is going to view this film. Possibly much more harsh than my evaluation. (Reply to this) |
|
pwnsauce3k writes: on Nov 08 2007 05:05 PM How can it be a non-partisan protest film? Whether or not a country ought to be engaged in a military action or not is inherently political. Have I misunderstood, here? (Reply to this) |
|
witherwings writes: on Nov 08 2007 05:51 PM I'm glad Matthew Michael Carnahan is explaining the Lions for Lambs agenda. It was just so vague. (Reply to this) |
|
J. Ryan Sommes writes: on Nov 08 2007 06:49 PM It's not a protest film. It's a a call to action film, if that makes sense. (Reply to this) |
|
Metafact writes: on Nov 08 2007 07:44 PM *Pfft* Non-partisan? Please, don't make me laugh. (Reply to this) |
|
Young Turk writes: on Nov 08 2007 08:21 PM This is off topic but Tom Cruise is TINY!! (Reply to this) |
|
Bane Of Anubis writes: on Nov 08 2007 11:10 PM Non-partisan, Hollywood style (Reply to this) |
|
computerdude1032 writes: on Nov 09 2007 08:55 AM If you haven't seen the movie, then you can't say it is biased. I consider myself Conservative, and I didn't find the movie out of line at all. If anything, I thought it supported the Conservative point of view even more than the liberal (although you wouldn't guess that by watching the trailers) (Reply to this) |
|
sayzoom writes: on Nov 09 2007 04:49 PM I agree with computerdude. I saw the film this afternoon and I didn't feel it was a liberal propaganda film. What I was most impressed with is how I agreed with things said on both sides of the issue. The subject matter here is not black or white, nor is it democrat or republican. They are real issues that exist outside all of the partisan bull, and once you strip that away, as I feel it did in the film, you are forced to confront these issues for yourself, not as a member of a particular party. I've been thinking about the questions it raised since I got home, and it's forced me to look at what I believe and where I stand. I think that's an accomplishment. I think the main reason it's getting torn down by the critics is just that, as a film, not much happens -- it's just people talking. But as an instigator of discussion and a road toward self-reflection, it works better than any film I've seen this year. Go check it out before you decide whether it's biased or not -- I guarantee you, whether you like it or not, it will engage you long after you leave the theatre. (Reply to this) |
|
pinkincide writes: on Nov 09 2007 06:09 PM "...the American public to be less apathetic towards the war and to do something." "Something" like supporting the war with greater enthusiasm? This being a non-partisan project and all I'm sure that was at the top of the list. (Reply to this) |
|
sayzoom writes: on Nov 09 2007 11:47 PM Pinkincide, I realize the trailer makes it seem kind of partisan, and pulling sound bites from it is an easy way to discredit it, but to answer your question -- yes. The message of the movie is that people need to decide what they stand for, either way, and be pro-active about it. Two of the characters in the movie are students who feel so strongly about being part of the solution that they join the military -- and while Redford's character wishes they hadn't, he greatly admires them for "doing SOMETHING", even if that means something which he, personally, doesn't believe in -- in fact, he's talking to an apathetic kid, who, from this conversation, actually thinks Redford is trying to recruit him into the Army. Redford is not telling him to protest on the streets and end the war, he's telling him to stop being apathetic about where he stands and engage in the conversation. See the movie before you decide whether it's partisan or not. I've read so many comments from people condemning the movie as liberal propaganda and it's just not true. I think it's sad that so many people have already decided what this movie is, for the most part, wrongly, and so won't go see it because of their misinformed preconceptions. The movie uses the war as a background -- the movie is not ABOUT the war -- it's about standing up for what you believe in, whatever that may be, and actively engaging in the conversations -- the very ones, I might add, that people are over there dying for us to have. See the movie. Then decide if it's partisan. It's not what you expect it to be. (Reply to this) |
|
JJcrash writes: on Nov 10 2007 11:56 AM Sayzoom, you make a good point that people need to see a movie before making up their minds, but there is a problem with that. Hollywood takes ticket sales as a sign that they are relevant and agreed with on political issues. Since the trailers make this movie look like it an anti-war movie, that will deter many people. Perhaps if the movie trailer folks could be more accurate about movies in general, we would be able to tell a little better what the audiences are really interested in seeing. How many times have you gone to a movie that was sold as something completely different in the trailer? We need an investigation! I think there is a conspiracy. (Reply to this) |
|
sayzoom writes: on Nov 11 2007 12:07 AM Agreed. The trailer to the film is a problem. You're right. Shame, too, because I really do think people should see it -- only for the conversation and thought processes the film inspires. The critics have been harsh on it, and I agree with them to a point -- it's a talkfest that works better as a presentation of ideas rather than as a piece of entertainment -- but I think it's a shame that we've become so apathetic about things that the mere suggestion of a "political thinker" is enough to drive people away from theatres. What happened? When did people become so uninterested in the very Democracy we pride ourselves on? Why are we so content to be ignorant to what's going on in and outside of our own country? Anyway -- these are some of the questions the film asks, and I think they are very relevent and important questions...THAT'S why I want people to see the movie. I just think it's sad, I guess, that people went in droves to see Saw IV, something that essentially boils down to torture porn, and will stay away from an interesting, important film such as this...oh well...I'm glad I saw it. (Reply to this) |
|
CaptainSiberia writes: on Nov 11 2007 05:04 AM And what does he have to say about the cold critical reception? (Reply to this) |
|
ARAGORN2123 writes: on Nov 11 2007 03:17 PM In reply to this comment (#1263790) It only makes sense if you are pretentious, liberal twit! (Reply to this) |
|
ARAGORN2123 writes: on Nov 11 2007 04:00 PM In reply to this comment (#1268502) sayzoom...are you kidding? Did you actually see this snoozefest? This clunker was sheer torture to sit through, thank God I took my earplugs. The final 70 minutes were actually pretty good as long as I couldn't hear the dialogue. Btw, sayzoom, if it takes a movie extolling the virtues of hating America to make you "think", you obviously need some help. (Reply to this) |
|
BishopHaHa writes: on Nov 11 2007 04:28 PM "I'm the first to rant and rave about fighting a war on two fronts. " He must hate reading about WWII. "A call to action in so far as I wrote this down to see if it would resonate with anybody else. " And from the numbers apparently it is not. "Frankly, I don't really care. I don't want to piss people off, just to piss them off." Wow! That must be some of that non-partisan stuff you made the film from. (Reply to this) |
|
MainFragger writes: on Nov 11 2007 10:17 PM The message I got out of the movie.. Politicians are full of it, reporters may or may not be full of it, and if you are a student, don't join the fight because you'll get killed for nothing.. This movie was the biggest waste of my time ever.. (only a hair behind Napoleon Dynamite..because that turned out to be an effective waste of time since I was trying to waste time when I saw it..) I feel like I watched a stand up comedian tell jokes for an hour and a half and realized he wasn't even telling jokes, just un-funny anecdotes. In short, I kept waiting for something to happen, something to resolve, someone to have a full opinion, some one to either succeed or be called to the carpet for failure, someone to decide to do something..anything interesting.. Nope. Never happened. This movie serves up a nice cup of air that isn't half empty, isn't half full...its just empty.. (Reply to this) |
|
MainFragger writes: on Nov 11 2007 10:18 PM The message I got out of the movie.. Politicians are full of it, reporters may or may not be full of it, and if you are a student, don't join the fight because you'll get killed for nothing.. This movie was the biggest waste of my time ever.. (only a hair behind Napoleon Dynamite..because that turned out to be an effective waste of time since I was trying to waste time when I saw it..) I feel like I watched a stand up comedian tell jokes for an hour and a half and realized he wasn't even telling jokes, just un-funny anecdotes. In short, I kept waiting for something to happen, something to resolve, someone to have a full opinion, some one to either succeed or be called to the carpet for failure, someone to decide to do something..anything interesting.. Nope. Never happened. This movie serves up a nice cup of air that isn't half empty, isn't half full...its just empty.. (Reply to this) |
|
fredjones writes: on Nov 12 2007 12:30 PM THANK YOU FOR THIS FILM! IT'S DESPERATELY NEEDED IN THIS WORLD RIGHT NOW AND WILL INSPIRE MANY TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |






