Lindsay Lohan to Show Up in "Mission Impossible 3"?
It's a juicy piece of gossip that's been floating around the net for the past few days, but ComingSoon.net gets the citation because I just dig the site. Seems that controversial heartthrob Lindsay Lohan ("Mean Girls") let something slip while she was being interviewed on an L.A. radio station: she'd recently met with "Mission Impossible 3" director J.J. Abrams, for undisclosed reasons.
Combine this with the earlier news that Scarlett Johansson had to leave the project because of scheduling difficulties, and it seems that Ms. Lohan might soon be involved in some high-flying & spying heroics. Stay tuned, Lohan lovers...
Combine this with the earlier news that Scarlett Johansson had to leave the project because of scheduling difficulties, and it seems that Ms. Lohan might soon be involved in some high-flying & spying heroics. Stay tuned, Lohan lovers...
Related Items
| Movie: | |
| Celeb: | Scarlett Johansson |
| Jeffrey Abrams | |
| Lindsay Lohan |
|
skletonkee writes: on May 18 2005 07:22 AM [b]Mission Impossible 3: Drug Intervention?[/b] goodness gracious......she used to be so beautiful.... why god? why do you let young girls snort coke? such a shame.. (Reply to this) |
|
taran72 writes: on May 18 2005 09:51 AM [b]this movie...[/b] ...is now officially unwatchable. How far we've fallen from the first move. (Reply to this) |
|
VML writes: on May 18 2005 12:52 PM This is going to be interesting... (Reply to this) |
|
renodc writes: on May 18 2005 09:06 PM Oh Lord, please let this be a rumor. This project keeps getting worse. First, Joe Carnahan (Narc) leaves the project due to creative differences, I'm assuming, with Cruise. Then, Cruise hires J.J. Abrams, who is a TV director with no film experience, which is more than likely a disaster waiting to happen. Then, one of the most promising aspects of this film, which was the attachment of Carrie-Anne Moss and Scarlett Johansson to the project, went down the toilet with the signing of Abrams who couldn't start filming because of Alias filming. I didn't think it could possibly get any worse until I read this thread and found out I was wrong. It can get a lot worse. (Reply to this) |
|
lonechicken writes: on May 19 2005 07:12 AM [b]lighten up[/b] Not thrilled with the Lohan thing, especially since she's been on the Jennifer Connelly "I was beautiful but I'll ruin that by getting incredibly skinny" diet. The first movie was an absolute mess with count them 1 and a half action scenes. Not as good as people think they remember it to be. Robert Towne just didn't have what it takes anymore to write for these kinds of movies. J.J. Abrams is perfect as long as he gets free reign. Just about every Alias episode this season seems like it can be a great 1 hour MI mission, in the classic "team" sense as opposed to the first two MI movies being heavily Ethan centric. (Reply to this) |
|
wildseid writes: on May 19 2005 10:52 AM lonechicken : "The first movie was an absolute mess with count them 1 and a half action scenes...." Uhh...The first movie was kick-a** ! Much rather have fewer action scenes and more story development than the reverse... The sequel made me puke. MI3 - hey! at least it isn't John Woo again... *whew*, but oh no! Lindsay Lohan! This is just horrible, unless she gets killed in the first 3 minutes... (Reply to this) |
|
Despot writes: on May 19 2005 01:04 PM [b]geez[/b] to go from Scarlett to Lohan, oh man, what a drop off in talent, (an imo beauty as well). Who ever thought this was a good idea needs to be shot, or at least beatten with bats or something (Reply to this) |
|
metroidcrazy92 writes: on May 19 2005 04:37 PM wellll as long as shes not tom cruise's girlfriend in the movie it might be ok and if shes just a crazy computer nerd that would be fine but they really do have 2 put seth green in movies as computer nerds more often anyway as long as she dies sure (Reply to this) |
|
lonechicken writes: on May 20 2005 06:07 AM [b]wildseid[/b] Sorry, in my opinion the first movie was both boring from an action standpoint as well as a mess plot-wise/story-wise. Not a confusing mess, but a pretentious and moronic mess. So unentertaining on both fronts. At least the second was entertaining from an action standpoint. (Reply to this) |
|
new_school_critic writes: on May 21 2005 05:59 PM [b]Movie...[/b] probaly won't be that good, most of anything out of Hollywood isn't. But speaking of Lohan, my favorite little cane sniffer is 18 isn't she? Maybe they'll just have her naked to bring an extra 20 mil to the Box office? (Reply to this) |
|
Ophiuchus writes: on May 24 2005 04:46 PM She's only 18? Wow. She certainly made it to fame at an early age. (Reply to this) |
|
llrox writes: on Dec 20 2005 11:25 AM In reply to this comment (#822196) [b]Oh u all spaks in here. Can tel ur probly american[/b] Lindsay lOhan rox! She is ace. You all saying she snorts coke lmfao dik heds! Cos for one thing there has never even been rumours bout that. Oh go get a life. U try acting like she does.! Coke my ass! There ya go a bit of americano lingo lol idiots. Anywayz i must go got better things to do thatn correct everybodys sad lives that they wwrite shit about her thats crap! Sad twats (8)Its lonely sometimes in the fast lane(8) (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |






