Ask Anyone Who Drives to Work if a "Rush Hour" is a Good Thing
Not very long ago we (I mean: everyone) reported that "Rush Hour 3" probably wouldn't happen because Chris Tucker was allegedly unhappy with the $20 million he was being offered. Well, apparently Tucker's business manager is a pretty convincing guy, because it now looks like Tucker, Jackie Chan, director Brett Ratner, and screenwriter Jeff Nathanson have signed up to deliver what the world really and truly wants: A third action comedy about a black guy and an Asian guy who bicker a whole lot.
According to Variety, "After years of intricate negotiation New Line has finally gotten "Rush Hour 3" on the fast track.
Studio has at long last signed Chris Tucker, Jackie Chan, director Brett Ratner and screenwriter Jeff Nathanson to return for the sequel.
Tucker will earn $20 million against 20% of gross, and his deal comes with a second-picture commitment for the same salary on a film to be determined later. Thesp has given up script approval as long as the final draft matches what Nathanson pitched.
Chan will get around $15 million against 15% of gross, but he will also own the film's distribution rights in China and Hong Kong.
Ratner will get a spike on the upfront part of the $5 million-against-5% gross deal he had on "Rush Hour 2."
Nathanson, who scripted the last film, will be paid seven figures to write the third installment.
New Line has the option to greenlight the pic by May, based on script approval and a budget the studio hopes won't exceed $120 million, which seems low by summer tentpole standards -- especially given the generous above-the-line expenditure. That greenlight would trigger pay-or-play deals for the helmer and the two stars.
The film will begin shooting next summer in the U.S. and Paris and anchor the studio's summer 2007 schedule."
--
Seems like a helluva lot of money for the second sequel to one of the most generic concepts ever created, but hey, what do I know? The first two "Rush Hour"s made huge coin at the box office, so I guess it's a good investment.
According to Variety, "After years of intricate negotiation New Line has finally gotten "Rush Hour 3" on the fast track.
Studio has at long last signed Chris Tucker, Jackie Chan, director Brett Ratner and screenwriter Jeff Nathanson to return for the sequel.
Tucker will earn $20 million against 20% of gross, and his deal comes with a second-picture commitment for the same salary on a film to be determined later. Thesp has given up script approval as long as the final draft matches what Nathanson pitched.
Chan will get around $15 million against 15% of gross, but he will also own the film's distribution rights in China and Hong Kong.
Ratner will get a spike on the upfront part of the $5 million-against-5% gross deal he had on "Rush Hour 2."
Nathanson, who scripted the last film, will be paid seven figures to write the third installment.
New Line has the option to greenlight the pic by May, based on script approval and a budget the studio hopes won't exceed $120 million, which seems low by summer tentpole standards -- especially given the generous above-the-line expenditure. That greenlight would trigger pay-or-play deals for the helmer and the two stars.
The film will begin shooting next summer in the U.S. and Paris and anchor the studio's summer 2007 schedule."
--
Seems like a helluva lot of money for the second sequel to one of the most generic concepts ever created, but hey, what do I know? The first two "Rush Hour"s made huge coin at the box office, so I guess it's a good investment.
Related Items
| Movie: | Rush Hour 2 |
| Celeb: | Jackie Chan |
| Chris Tucker | |
| Jeff Nathanson | |
| Brett Ratner |
|
puablo writes: on Nov 21 2005 07:37 AM [b]Better be worth it[/b] I think it would have been better if they did this soon after Rush Hour 2 when people would eat up a third one. I just hope all this drama hasn't weakened the movie to where it ends up being an obvious "let's squeeze more money out of this" sequel. (Reply to this) |
|
insanemansam5 writes: on Nov 21 2005 08:13 AM Hey I thought people saw the first two rush hours because of jackie chan not chris rock. Why is chris rock making more money than jackie chan? I defenitely would watch a rush hour film without chirs rock in it but there's no way I would ever go see it if it didn't have jackie. The producers behind rush hour should have taken a cue from the philedelphia eagles and not payed chris the money. (Reply to this) |
|
Eros_Amor writes: on Nov 21 2005 09:00 AM they should have casted Dave Chappelle (Reply to this) |
|
TheAnswerMVP2001 writes: on Nov 21 2005 10:35 AM In reply to this comment (#827955) For one thing it's Chris Tucker not Chris Rock, there is a difference...Chris Rock has more talent which hurts to say cause I really don't like either of them. Tucker probably got the lecture that let's see what has he done since the last Rush Hour.... ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! Other than get mixed in the Michael Jackson molestation thing. $20 mill is way more than he should be getting since other than the Rush Hour films he hasn't done jack. What a loser. (Reply to this) |
|
pota1967 writes: on Nov 21 2005 11:06 AM New Line is crazy--no wonder hollywood is in trouble (Reply to this) |
|
Sadistik writes: on Nov 21 2005 12:13 PM Tucker sure has balls to demand $20 mill. But it looks like someone was stupid enough to do it. (Reply to this) |
|
The Senhman writes: on Nov 21 2005 12:39 PM [b]Chris actually did a smart thing...[/b] He didn't hurt himself like Chan did by doing way too many movies in between. The Shanghai Noon series didn't hurt Chan, but Around the World in 80 Days and The Medallion (even though it's a HK production) hurt Chan's leverage. (Reply to this) |
|
lovelykeira writes: on Nov 21 2005 12:41 PM I thought the first two were pretty entertaining but shit the studio sure is throwing the money out there and Tucker definetly isn't worth that much. They better actually make a good movie sequel and not a piece of shit if they hope the film will do well enough for them to make profit. (Reply to this) |
|
Prog5000 writes: on Nov 21 2005 01:03 PM CHRIS TUCKER!!! (Reply to this) |
|
LaputanMachine writes: on Nov 21 2005 03:04 PM In Rush Hour 3, Chan and Tucker go to the inner cities of America and make fun of poor black people! But, it's all in good fun, of course. (Reply to this) |
|
zeromark16 writes: on Nov 21 2005 04:32 PM I don't care. Am I the only person who thought Tucker had hilarious delivery in RH2? Also, let's get Don Cheadle and Jeremy Piven back. Somehow. (Reply to this) |
|
Legalos245 writes: on Nov 21 2005 05:30 PM [b]Yes[/b] Finally, I love the two Rush Hour movies, Rush Hour 2 being one of my favorite comedies. It's about time, i've been waiting for this for awhile. (Reply to this) |
|
Saint_Angst writes: on Nov 21 2005 05:46 PM did we REALLY need another sequel? Ugh. Not getting my money. (Reply to this) |
|
Banana Kid writes: on Nov 21 2005 05:56 PM And people wonder why there's a box-office slump. (Reply to this) |
|
Infernal writes: on Nov 21 2005 07:10 PM [b]Oh, yes.[/b] Ah. Finally. Yes, been waiting a while. Anyway. Personally, I reckon this movie will be a great success. I mean, this series is becoming a trilogy and I think it ought to stay that way. A third movie to finish it off would be awesome after two great films before. Plus, I doubt Tucker would sign for a fourth. These two are hilarious together, and it'll just be perfect to end with some joyous Chan-action. And Laputan, don't be a fool. When did they ever make fun of poor African-Americans in the first two movies, and what gives you the right to bloody nag these guys for doing it with no back-up to your comment? Moron. (Reply to this) |
|
lavatory love machine writes: on Nov 21 2005 09:52 PM rush hour was fun, rh2 had no story, it was just a series of gags with a wasted zhang ziyi. I hope they try to make it bigger and putting them in real danger, that might make it good (Reply to this) |
|
QwizzicalWitness writes: on Nov 22 2005 07:19 AM In reply to this comment (#827965) [b]The key is...[/b] If anyone who is anyone about this movie is listening, they've got to get this straight... The storyline was headed to "Madison Square Garden", so "Lee" (Chan) could "see the Knicks play" (and go after the character played by Rosalyn Sanchez. The key to whether this movie succeeds or fails is the love story predicated by Rush Hour 2. That is the storyline that everyone has wanted to see finished for the longest time, including myself. Hopefully, Rosalyn Sanchez will sign up for this movie to play that part, because she and Chan have EXCELLENT on-screen chemistry! Anyone who's anyone, let the appropriate people know this! They've got to keep the love plot line, and the logical sequence of events leads to NYC!!! (Reply to this) |
|
SIRxxxTMG writes: on Nov 22 2005 08:13 PM The Rush Hour movies are tons of fun, I cant wait for the third installment in the series. (Reply to this) |
|
jublin writes: on Nov 23 2005 11:18 PM [b]I love it baby[/b] I can't wait. Jackie doesn't need the money, let Chris Tucker have it. He is a mess anyways. And for the record... I honestly don't think anyone but you, QuizzicalWitness, cares about the stupid love story. They don't need to go to New York for the movie to succeed. It just has to be funny and have awesome action scenes. (Reply to this) |
|
JonDeer956 writes: on Nov 26 2005 08:09 AM [b]Finally!![/b] Rush Hour 3 is finally on the way!!!!! Yeah, you all my say . "Tucker is getting $20 mill and Jackie $15 mill?".....but hey, the point is that they are both back including Bret Ratner. Rush Hour 1 & 2 are classics and with everybody back...what are the chances of Rush Hour 3 joining the pack? (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |










