RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Found a Bug? Squash It! Report Bugs Here
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
Trekking With Tim, Day One: Star Trek: The Motion Picture
Editor Tim Ryan begins his journey through the Star Trek film franchise.
by Tim Ryan | April 23, 2009
Discuss Article



Day One: Star Trek: The Motion Picture

RT Editor's log, Stardate 1321.7: These are my voyages on the Starship Enterprise. My 11-day mission: to explore the strange world of the Star Trek film franchise, to seek out a new understanding of the venerable sci-fi series, to boldly go where I have never gone before.

First, a little about me, and why I think I'm particularly suited to this project: I am a Star Trek agnostic. I've seen a couple episodes from the original series (or ST:TOS, for those fluent in Trekkie), and I watched a lot of the cartoon on Nickelodeon when my family first got cable. I also remember seeing (and enjoying) The Undiscovered Country during a cold December visit with cousins (Michigan was as snowy as the planet Rura Penthe that night). I have a basic understanding of the main characters' personality traits and responsibilities (Scotty is the engineer, Sulu pilots the ship, etc.), and I've been intrigued by discussions of the political subtext of the original and its many spinoffs. Anyway, I can't deny that Star Trek continues to exert a powerful hold on the collective pop culture consciousness, as evidenced by the buzz surrounding J.J. Abrams' forthcoming reboot. Thus, I have immersed myself in Trek lore, and I will attempt to evaluate the series' 11 films with a mix of Spock-like logic and Bones-esque vigor.

Before delving into Star Trek: The Motion Picture, a bit of background is in order. When it first debuted on NBC in 1966, Star Trek developed a hardcore following but was hardly a ratings winner. (Only a massive letter-writing campaign by devoted fans won the series a third season.) The show was canceled in 1969, but developed a broader cult following in syndication. After years of false starts, script revisions, and even a NASA space shuttle named after the Enterprise, Roddenberry began work on a new series, Star Trek: Phase II. However, Paramount Television Service, which had been developing the show and was to air the series, was dissolved, and the success of Star Wars and Close Encounters of the Third Kind convinced the studio to reconceive the pilot episode of Phase II into a feature. The result was Star Trek: The Motion Picture.

Why bring up so much back story? Well, essentially, because it explains what's wrong at the core of ST:TMP. The movie feels more like a continuation of the TV series, not a standalone entity. It's not that the studio was stingy; indeed, up to that point, ST:TMP had one of the largest budgets in movie history. And there are certainly some improvements over the look and feel of the series; the sets are extravagantly rendered (in particular, the Enterprise looks great), and Jerry Goldsmith's stirring score was compelling enough to be recycled for later films (as well as acting as the title theme for Star Trek: The Next Generation).

The bigger issue is the script, or lack thereof. Spliced together from treatments written for Phase II, there's a piecemeal feel to the story (in fact, several of the principal cast members grumbled that the film was underwritten, and shortchanged the characterization). And for me, an admitted neophyte, there wasn't enough pull; this feels like an insider's movie.

Star Trek: The Motion Picture tells the story of the Enterprise's encounter with a powerful energy cloud that has destroyed everything in its path -- including a Klingon warship. And it's headed toward Earth! As ST:TMP opens, the crew of the Enterprise has scattered; Spock (Leonard Nimoy) is on his home planet of Vulcan, Leonard "Bones" McCoy (DeForest Kelley) is in retirement, and James T. Kirk (William Shatner) has been promoted to Admiral with a desk job in San Francisco, with series newcomer Willard Decker (Stephen Collins) in command of the ship. Kirk assumes control of the ship to the consternation of Decker, and coaxes his old crew to get back together for the mission. (One of my colleagues finds it hilarious and ironic that Decker went on to play the dad on 7th Heaven, an irony that's lost on me because I've never seen that show. As you can probably guess by now, I don't watch a lot of television.)

There's a nice, slow-burning scene in which Scotty (James Doohan) transports Kirk to the Enterprise; the ship is given a more loving introduction than any of the characters, but it's not hard to imagine O.G. Trekkies in a state of happy delirium. And therein lies one of the major problems of ST:TMP: it spends almost no time on the individual members of the crew. When we first see Kirk, he's walking through Starfleet headquarters in San Francisco, when he's informed the Enterprise is due to launch, and darts off. This is how they're introducing the main character? If you want to get the non-acolytes involved, it's a good idea to have some sort of expository scenes to establish who these people (or Vulcans) are.

Anyway, the Enterprise runs into the energy cloud and gets pummeled, but that's not even the worst part. An alien probe has infected Ilia (Persis Khambatta), the ship's navigator, killing her and replacing her with a robot (kinda like what goes down in Metropolis). From Ilia (looking good for a bald, stuttering robot), the crew discovers that at the center of the cloud is V'Ger, who wants to join with its "creator." Spock decides to mind-meld with V'Ger, and in one of the movie's most visually arresting scenes, makes a dangerous spacewalk to learn more about the being. It has somehow gained sentience, and wants to report back to its creator, but feels bereft of purpose (it seems that even mechanical life forms struggle with depression).

It turns out the probe has evolved from the Voyager 6 from the 20th Century, and its creator is humanity. Since V'Ger wants to meet its creator in person, Decker volunteers to join with the robot probe to save the universe. Decker's fate seems similar to that of Poochie on The Simpsons; you kind of figure he's not going to be around by the end (to be fair, the character isn't given enough room to create an individual personality; mostly he seems cranky that Kirk took over his ship).

I'm going to come right out and say it: I didn't find Star Trek: The Motion Picture all that involving. The movie is intentionally cerebral (the filmmakers wanted to distinguish the movie from the more visceral pleasures of Star Wars), which is not a problem per se (I've enjoyed plenty of non-laser-infested sci-fi flicks, from both versions of Solaris to 2001, a film to which ST:TMP is heavily indebted). But it's often confusing, it lacks human drama, and, compared with such contemporary visions as Alien -- also released in 1979 -- it looks a bit drab.

I don't think Star Trek: the Motion Picture is without merit. It's just that, as a non-Trekkie, I didn't feel it utilized the cinematic medium as fully as it could have, nor did it fully draw me into the universe of Trek lore. Nevertheless, I'm hardly daunted in my mission. Next up: KHHHHAAAAAANNNNNN! (Sorry, I don't know what got a hold of me. I meant Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan.) As they say at the end of ST:TMP, "The human adventure is just beginning."

Stardates:

  • Day One: Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979)
  • Day Two: Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan (1982)
  • Day Three: Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984)
  • Day Four: Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986)
  • Day Five: Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989)
  • Day Six: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991)
  • Day Seven: Star Trek: Generations (1994)
  • Day Eight: Star Trek: First Contact (1996)
  • Day Nine: Star Trek: Insurrection (1998)
  • Day Ten: Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)
  • Day Eleven: Star Trek (2009)
Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-20 of 46 posts) | Reply
ledawg1138
ledawg1138 writes:
on Apr 23 2009 05:17 PM

FIRST! (As far as I know.) Yes, all day I've been waiting for this. Watching, waiting, realizing I should leave and come back and check. AND I"m BACK!

Anyway, this is a bad way to start off the films. If you're just getting into Star Trek, you'd never know the crew had such great chemistry. Leonard Nimoy said in "I Am Spock", "It was joyless" and called it "The Motionless Picture". And I agree. It' just eye candy. In short, 5/10. Good job, I'll keep reading your take.


(Reply to this)
tomwaitsjr
tomwaitsjr writes:
on Apr 23 2009 05:22 PM

2/10

Horrible. Boring. Nimoy's ranking is dead-on.


(Reply to this)
ARTaylor
ARTaylor writes:
on Apr 23 2009 05:53 PM

A well known nickname of the movie among TrekkIEs is Star Trek: The Motionless Picture.

I personally don't mind it. It's not bad, but not good. Just uninteresting. The only thing I really enjoy is the updated Enterprise, which is still my favorite design of all of them. Otherwise the movie is pretty forgettable. If they had continued making the movies like this the series would definitely be dead by the third movie and we never would have gotten TNG. Thank God Nicholas Meyer saved the franchise.


(Reply to this)
damvbat
damvbat writes:
on Apr 23 2009 06:21 PM

This review makes me want to rewatch these movies again

(Reply to this)
Tim Ryan
Tim Ryan writes:
on Apr 23 2009 06:43 PM

In reply to this comment (#2437401)
Thanks, man! That's what I'm going for. Check the schedule to see when I'll be watching what if you want to follow along.

(Reply to this)
tomwaitsjr
tomwaitsjr writes:
on Apr 23 2009 07:08 PM

Wrath of Khan is my favorite. I was pretty young when I saw it. That whole thing with putting that insect into their ears, etc., freaked me out. It would have been the perfect film if there was a way to get Tatoo in there. . .

(Reply to this)
Shawndorman
Shawndorman writes:
on Apr 23 2009 07:16 PM

Star Trek TMP is quite a dilemma...I can't blame you for not enjoying it. Although I find the movie strangely endearing (as a kid, I couldn't get enough of it...don't ask me why), there's no doubt that it's incredibly boring. Whenever I'm up at an ungodly hour of the night and can't get to sleep, I just pop this baby in the DVD player and by the extended introduction of the Enterprise, I'm out.

Another interesting fact is that the woman who plays Stephen Collins wife on 7th Heaven has a supporting role in Star Trek IV the Voyage Home. I guess the producers of the show were big fans?


(Reply to this)
niall1
niall1 writes:
on Apr 23 2009 07:26 PM

k star trek: tmp isnt THAT bad..its definitely not the final frontier..which is terrible..

cant wait for more of these


(Reply to this)
anglefans2008
anglefans2008 writes:
on Apr 23 2009 07:30 PM

A friend of mine recommended me a HOT place *** Richsearching com *** She has been intimate with someone who she gets to know on this site. It's easy as apple pie because the members there looking for guys who can spend on them.

(Reply to this)
ledawg1138
ledawg1138 writes:
on Apr 23 2009 07:32 PM

In reply to this comment (#2437447)
Maybe you couldn't get enough because it was STAR TREK! I used to watch Batman Forever all the time because I wanted Batman, and looking back I find it's pretty bad. You may have watched Star Trek: The Motionless Picture because it was Star Trek, so you were blinded. It carries the Star Trek name, so why not? But, that's just me going into the whole thing deeper.

(Reply to this)
reavus4983
reavus4983 writes:
on Apr 23 2009 07:42 PM

I've been a Star Trek fan since I was 4, have seen every movie multiple times. This one I've never made it through awake. Never. It's not even Star Trek. It's like 2001 starring William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy. I don't even consider it part of the series.

(Reply to this)
AniMill
AniMill writes:
on Apr 23 2009 08:00 PM

I believe the fans called it: "Star Trek - The Motion Sickness"

The "2001 meets Kirk/Spock" was right on. This was an attempt at making a Thinking Fans movie, and failed utterly. It's a great example of what happens when people are given too much budget and control - chaos. Whereas, "Star Trek - The Wrath of Khan" is the perfect example of what happens when people work under extraordinary restrictions, as that film was forced to work to share sets and reuse & reduced effects - this all helped to drive a film that relied more upon its story and characters than its visuals.

It's my hope that the new Star Trek has the perfect balance of story/characters/visuals...


(Reply to this)
ledawg1138
ledawg1138 writes:
on Apr 23 2009 08:01 PM

In reply to this comment (#2437463)
That's enough out of you.

(Reply to this)
jokerboy1991
jokerboy1991 writes:
on Apr 23 2009 08:07 PM

It was pretty disappointing, there was a director's cut right? I don't think I ever saw that cut, but yeah the motion picture was pretty mediocre.

(Reply to this)
ledawg1138
ledawg1138 writes:
on Apr 23 2009 08:14 PM

In reply to this comment (#2437497)
It wasn't that much better.

(Reply to this)
g.mauler
g.mauler writes:
on Apr 23 2009 08:22 PM

Yep, beautiful, boring picture. But I can't believe no one's mentioned those pajama-uniforms. What were the costume designers thinking???

(Reply to this)
screwhead100
screwhead100 writes:
on Apr 23 2009 08:51 PM

i cant wait til they do this for the terminator movies, even though there isnt as many......

anyways, i cant wait to read up on the reviews for all of these b/c i never really got into the star trek lore and i want to give it a chance.......


(Reply to this)
scifimark
scifimark writes:
on Apr 23 2009 09:17 PM

Actually the background of it really makes sense. I thought the movie was alright but the special effect scenes are boring and way to long. Also i remember i watched it with my dad and he said when i watched it was basically the same as one the original episodes. It was the episode dont know what it was called but the one with NOMAD and i cant disagree. Its essentially the same story with minor modifications.

I give the movie a 4/10


(Reply to this)
Jared A.
Jared A. writes:
on Apr 23 2009 09:27 PM

Every once in a while I'll pop in ST:TMP just to watch the effects. Which are stunning. One of the most beautiful Sci-Fi films ever made. If only the story and characters were on the same level. But god this sucker is boring. The characters (if you can even call them that from this film) act differently and much blander than they have ever been before or since. Perhaps the worst jumping on point in all of Star Trek. But look at it this way Tim, it's all up hill from here (until 5 at least...)

(Reply to this)
sunsaz
sunsaz writes:
on Apr 23 2009 10:24 PM

The only things that this film contributed to the series was the Jerry Goldsmith score/future TNG theme and a cinema-ready Enterprise. Other than that, the series could've done without this entry. ST2 would've been a perfect and seamless way to kick off the ST film series IMO.

(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2 3
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

Star Trek: The Motion Picture
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • Where Will Star Trek Boldly Go Next? (21)
  • Trekking With Tim, Day One: Star Trek: The Motion Picture (46)
  • Exclusive: The World of WALL-E (10)
  • Star Trek's Anton Yelchin Talks Chekov Accent and Klingons (3)
  • Matt Damon Sets the Star Trek Record Straight (23)
  • "Fanboys": It's Not Just for "Star Wars" Fans (14)
  • "Star Trek" Screenwriters Bring Us Up to Date (13)
  • New "Star Trek" Flick to Hit Theaters on Christmas (2008) (21)
  • James McAvoy to Play Young Scotty in the New "Star Trek"?? (5)
  • J.J. Abrams Wants Newbies to See His "Star Trek" Movie (19)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (181)
  • Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (92)
  • Ban Them All! 10 Infamously Controversial Movies (72)
  • 5 Facts About The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (66)
  • Friday Harvest: The Road, Avatar, and more! (49)
  • Critics Consensus: Flee From Ninja Assassin (45)
  • Five Favorite Films With Zombieland Director Ruben Fleischer (22)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (16)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Zombieland 2 in 3D? (10)
  • Total Recall: Children's Book Adaptations (3)

Latest News

  • Weekly Ketchup: Zombieland 2 in 3D? (10)
  • Duncan Jones Reteams With Kevin Spacey (2)
  • Friday Harvest: The Road, Avatar, and more! (49)
  • Ban Them All! 10 Infamously Controversial Movies (72)
  • 5 Facts About The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (66)
  • RT on DVD: The Hangover, The Proposal, Glee (0)
  • Five Favorite Films With Zombieland Director Ruben Fleischer (22)
  • Total Recall: Children's Book Adaptations (3)
  • Critics Consensus: Flee From Ninja Assassin (45)
  • RT's Disney Animation Celebration --- A Walk Through The Magic Kingdom! (0)

Latest Interviews

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (16)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (11)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (21)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (8)
  • RT on DVD: Wassup, Bruno (3)
  • Scott Hicks Talks The Boys Are Back (0)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (15)
  • Richard Kelly chats about The Box (2)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (21)
  • Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (8)

Latest Features

  • Ban Them All! 10 Infamously Controversial Movies (72)
  • 5 Facts About The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (66)
  • RT on DVD: The Hangover, The Proposal, Glee (0)
  • Five Favorite Films With Zombieland Director Ruben Fleischer (22)
  • Total Recall: Children's Book Adaptations (3)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (16)
  • RT on DVD: Harry Potter returns, Bella heads to Adventureland (4)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (21)
  • RT on DVD: Wassup, Bruno (3)
  • Five Favourite Films with Ang Lee (34)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.