Article Ratings & Comments

|
JAKEofMIDWORLD writes: on May 18 2009 03:45 PM Wow, very interesting. You were extremely wrong if you look at how the movie has stood the test of time and its cultural impact. Also, I'm pretty sure it was a huge success and didn't lose money like you tried to predict. (Reply to this) |
|
finan h. writes: on May 18 2009 06:13 PM omfg , u're such a tool , how could u ruin this classic movie which had 100% for years , i just want fukin stab u to death , stupid peace of **** , i bet u did this just to get attention and so that we could come to ur site and read ur reviews , well go to hell u fukin ******* , i'm so fukin pissed of right now , i cant believe t2 isnt 100% anymore , thx to this douche (Reply to this) |
|
ryanr0z writes: on May 18 2009 08:46 PM Congradulations on showing everyone that you are an attention whore. I'm glad you could honestly blemish one of the greatest sequels of all time just to be a rebel. How about you respectfully take your review off and stop being a movie critic cuz you obviously don't know a good film when you see it. (Reply to this) |
|
CynDaVaz writes: on May 18 2009 11:35 PM This person obviously posted such a review out of some sort of deranged motive. Whatever. He's clearly wrong in his generalizations. (Reply to this) |
|
CynDaVaz writes: on May 18 2009 11:36 PM In reply to this comment (#2484774) Ha ha - only 1 rotten "review" (his) . . 'nuff said. (Reply to this) |
|
Tipton B. writes: on May 19 2009 06:26 PM If I were you, I'd quit reviewing movies. If you want to be taken seriously as a movie reviewer, probably best not to dookie all over what is arguably the best action sci-fi movie of all time. I'd hate to see how you treat your kids. (Reply to this) |
|
Tipton B. writes: on May 19 2009 07:00 PM I need to append my earlier comment and apologize for jumping down your throat because I didn't realize the review was from 1991. I'm curious to see how you'd review the film now. (Reply to this) |
|
Chris B. writes: on May 19 2009 09:04 PM this guy must be good friends with armond white. (Reply to this) |
|
dommico writes: on May 21 2009 03:46 PM have yall seen mETACRITIC, IT HAS MUCH WORCE RVIEWS FOR THIS MOVIE (Reply to this) |
|
Max the Movie Kid writes: on May 22 2009 04:07 PM You are a big disappointment. Thanks for bringing down the 100% rating, a$$hat. (Reply to this) |
|
anthonynemer writes: on May 24 2009 08:58 AM We should probably send a Terminator back through time in order to eradicate you from this planet and preserve the 100% of this masterpiece. And by seeing your other critics, I'd say you're half a terrific criticizer -- the wrong half. (Reply to this) |
|
emps09 writes: on May 24 2009 09:03 AM I will quote Arnie on this "F*** you A**H***!!" (Reply to this) |
|
Cat Stevens writes: on May 26 2009 08:43 AM You're a ****ing ****, Richard. (Reply to this) |
|
thraengorn writes: on May 27 2009 07:01 PM wow this guy did the same thing to "do the right thing" and "missing", only rotten review... attention whore... he also gave "state of play" a bad review while giving "angels and demons" a good one... WTF?? (Reply to this) |
|
Isaac C. writes: on May 29 2009 08:27 PM I think that a movie should be able to have 1 rotten reviews and over 40 reviews over all to be listed as a 100%. If it has 2 or more then it should be less than a 100%. So that dooshers like Richard "Dickliss" Corliss doesn't get attention that it doesn't deserve. (Reply to this) |
|
goom writes: on May 31 2009 10:41 PM In reply to this comment (#2486273) haha, totally. this guy don't know what he's talking about. this movie is amazing (and i don't even like action all that much) (Reply to this) |
|
sulphurised writes: on Jun 04 2009 01:37 AM clearly a douche-bag (Reply to this) |
|
sulphurised writes: on Jun 04 2009 01:40 AM There's something wrong with you. You're a fat white bearded stinking bear. (Reply to this) |
|
Chuah S. writes: on Jun 07 2009 07:20 AM I find it very difficult to find the words to describe how good is Terminator Judgment Day. You must be really stupid. Only 1 rotten, F*** YOU A******. (Reply to this) |
|
ptcommish writes: on Jun 12 2009 09:37 AM This has to be embarrassing for Mr. Corliss....I would question any of his reveiws moving forward. It is funny to see how wrong he was. And, he seems SO wrapped up in how much the movie cost. All of that money was on the screen. An incredible film. I am going to see what movies he has missed as bad on. He should retire....NOW! T2 is a BRILLIANT film. (Reply to this) |









