RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Check out the new RT Community
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
Jen Gets Terminated, Day One: The Terminator
Watch along with RT as we revisit the Terminator franchise, one movie per day.
by Jen Yamato | May 18, 2009
Discuss Article



Day One: The Terminator

RT Bonded with James Bond, spent 12 Days with Friday the 13th, and Trekked with Tim; this week, we get Terminated by revisiting every Terminator film leading up to Terminator Salvation. I've seen The Terminator, love Terminator 2: Judgment Day, but could never be bothered to watch Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines all the way through. (I blame the casting of Claire Danes as a future resistance fighter.) I want Kyle Reese's stolen department store Nike Vandals, and am still baffled as to why that one-time promising break-out star of the '80s, Michael Biehn, never quite made it. In revisiting the Terminator franchise, I hope to unlock the secret of what makes for a good sequel, figure out its chicken/egg causality, and see how the new flick measures up to what's come before it.

And so, we begin.

The year is 1984. James Cameron - Canadian, Roger Corman effects designer, newbie director - debuts his seminal sci-fi thriller, The Terminator, which he'd written from a nightmare he had while helming his first flick, the Corman-produced Piranha II: The Spawning. The film begins in the year 2029 A.D. (just twenty years from now - prep those disaster emergency kits) and shows us that the future is a bleak wasteland where robot machines chase what's left of humanity through a junkyard world, equipped with lasers. Because in the '80s, nothing was deadlier than a laser.

After that bleak flash forward, we land in present day 1984, where Cameron introduces what will become a seminal character to the entire science fiction genre, in a single, simple shot. Amidst lightning flashes on a dark, gloomy night, a hulking male figure lands, nude, in dreary Los Angeles. It's the Governator!


Arnold Schwarzenegger (henceforth to be referred to as "Ahnold" or "The Governator"), at the time a 37-year-old seven-time Mr. Olympia bodybuilding champ who had reprised his titular role as Conan the Destroyer four months prior, had originally been considered for the role of soldier Kyle Reese (OJ Simpson, co-star Lance Henriksen, and Kyle Reese himself, Michael Biehn, were once considered for the Terminator role). Clearly, Cameron ultimately made the right choice, as juxtaposing the hulking, enormous muscled Ahnold with the smaller Biehn in this time traveling "landing" scene immediately makes Biehn - and by extension, humanity - the underdog up against the cold, killing machine that is the Terminator.

The Terminator is a science fiction horror flick, but it's not without its moments of humor. As the Governator approaches a trio of punks (say hello to Bill Paxton as "Punk Leader"), I swear you can see his junk in the shadows. To which I ask, why would a Terminator need genitals? As Ahnold takes a knifing, we see that he does not feel pain; as he demands clothes from the punks, we learn that his model has an Austrian accent. His deadpan delivery of mundane, every day lines like "Nice night for a walk" and scrolling through programming for possible responses like "F*** you, asshole" take the cake.


Shortly after, our hero lands: the perfectly coiffed, handsomely scruffy soldier from the future, Kyle Reese (played by the perfectly coiffed, handsomely scruffy Michael Biehn, who would star soon again for Cameron in the '80s sci-fi classics Aliens and The Abyss). If you pause on his landing scene, note the special effects work that went into adding subtle character details: ugly, painful scarring all over Reese's body reveal a lifetime of battle and also the resilience of a survivor, in a single visual snapshot.

We soon learn that both Ahnold and Reese are after an LA single gal named Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton, another future Cameron spouse along with producer Gale Ann Hurd). Sarah Connor is what can only be described as a damsel in distress, a character set up that is at first annoying but pays off in the end (and pays off big time in future films). But when we first meet her, it's clear Sarah is in need of help; she gets stood up by a date, messes up orders at work, is yelled at by customers. When she goes off to the movies by herself, leaving her even more annoying roommate and her boyfriend alone at home, we feel bad for her. And then, she realizes she's being followed.


The Terminator has one of the funniest kills in movie history, funny because the victim all but deserves it. It's also the first scene that reveals that this is indeed a horror movie - an indestructible killer on the loose, heroine being stalked - and happens because Sarah's roommate just can't put her Walkman down, even while getting a midnight snack after making love to her boyfriend. She dies in slow motion before Ahnold hears Sarah leaving a voicemail and realizes he's got the wrong girl.

All of which brings me to one drawback to The Terminator; it holds up, but it's dated. 1980s hair and fashion aside (remember, I love those Vandals), its characters are constantly felled by use of then-modern technology: Walkmen, old fashioned answering machines, day planners that tell pursuers which Big Bear cabins you might escape to... Even the Terminator wasted time by looking up all the Sarah Connors in LA in the phone book. But maybe that's the point; even with the aid of technology, you just can't fight technology from the future.


Sarah meets her two would-be suitors in a crowded nightclub alled TechNoir. Get it? TechNoir; future and past, technology and violence. Subtle. It's one of the film's best scenes, a ballet of three stranger characters moving towards each other, each isolated within a room full of oblivious dancers. Sarah - ever the passive victim - looks up to meet the barrel of Ahnold's gun, a deer in headlights until Reese pulls out his homemade sawed off shotgun and blasts the Terminator away. Alas, like every good serial killer/horror movie villain, the Governator doesn't die and engages Reese and Sarah in a car chase that culminates in two notable events: Ahnold performs an excruciating self-surgery on his own arm and eyeball (a nod to Un Chien Andalou?) and, finally, Sarah steps up and shows some balls, saving Reese from a suicidal cop showdown.

Held at the police station (where Paul Winfield and Lance Henriksen put on a great buddy cop routine), Reese tries in vain to explain that he's simply trying to save Sarah and, by extension, all of humanity from a killer robot from the future. Why won't they believe him? They do eventually, when Ahnold - delivering his famous "I'll be back" line to an unhelpful desk cop - smashes his way through the precinct. Cameron films Reese in upwardly angled hero shots as he rescues Sarah and drives off to spend the night under an overpass and continue cultivating their special Stockholm Syndrome-like bond. (Seriously, would you go anywhere with a crazy sounding dirty homeless looking man with a gun, let alone sleep with him on the second night?)


As Reese teaches Sarah about the future, I begin to wonder; how much of this "history" is circular? Reese teaches Sarah the things she'll teach her unborn son, who will grow up to teach a young Reese those very same things... And Reese and Sarah make love because he's been in love with her picture his whole life, which was given purposefully to him by John Connor so that he could send Reese back in time to save his mom and conceive him. And now my head is starting to hurt.

Thankfully, none of those time traveling implications matter just yet. The first Terminator is a horror movie, after all! That means more chases, more showdowns, more false endings (including the awesome scene in which the Terminator emerges from a truck explosion in its Endoskeleton form!) and finally, what I've been waiting for the whole time: the chance for wimpy Sarah Connor to grow a pair and save herself, her unborn son, and the future.


As Reese gets shot and begins to falter, Sarah starts to show some backbone. "On your feet, soldier!" she commands, and their dynamic is brilliantly reversed. They elude the Terminator through an empty factory until Reese sacrifices himself (good men are so hard to find), and Sara finds herself in pain for the first time, shrapnel lodged in her thigh. But wait, it's not over! The Terminator's Endo-torso is still alive and still in pursuit, and Sarah leads it on an agonizing slow crawl chase through smashing pistons and hydraulics; with a final "You're terminated, f***er," Sarah simultaneously beats the machine and tells us she's been reborn a heroine.

In the film's final scene, Sarah is driving through Mexico, pregnant and preparing tapes of instruction for her son. A boy snaps a candid photo of her that turns out to be the one that John gives Kyle Reese in the future, tying the film's questions about time travel and causality together. Sarah drives off into the distance - "a storm's coming," after all - and we wait to see what will happen next as the battle for humanity continues.


Jen Gets Terminated Dates:

  • Day One: The Terminator (1984)
  • Day Two: Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991)
  • Day Three: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)
  • Day Two: Terminator Salvation (2009)

Related Items
Movie: The Terminator
Celeb: Arnold Schwarzenegger
James Cameron
Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-20 of 50 posts) | Reply
JAKEofMIDWORLD
JAKEofMIDWORLD writes:
on May 18 2009 05:24 PM

My favorite movie. I love how the least important person in the world, Sarah, is the most important. So many awesome themes are touched on and from a science fiction angel it is great. From an action perspective it kicks major *** and that final showdown "you're terminated ****er" and Sarah making the tapes, holy **** I love this movie. The 80's style and fashions don't bother me because I grew up with this, but also, the movie is suppose to take place in 1984. If it were made now they would have tried to achieve that look, but I'm sure you couldn't beat the real thing.

(Reply to this)
JAKEofMIDWORLD
JAKEofMIDWORLD writes:
on May 18 2009 05:26 PM

Good job btw, I enjoyed the write-up.

(Reply to this)
Confounded
Confounded writes:
on May 18 2009 05:30 PM

I love this movie. My favorite secondary character was always Dr. Silberman. He was a human (a phychologist, no less) with zero empathy or tact. To me it always showed that the gap between humanity and the machines was never really as big as we would like to think.

I know you'll re-enjoy T2 tomorrow. I have a hard time considering it better or worse since they're completely different movies. It's like Alien/Aliens to me. The first is far more cerebral and horrifying. The second is much faster and more action-focused. It all depends on the mood I'm in at the time.

And T3 is pretty bad, given. But it was Nick Stahl that ruined it for me. Not that I have a problem with him; I still mourn Carnivale. But he was just too much of a whiney "why me" John Connor. You'd think he would've gotten that out of his system in the last movie.


(Reply to this)
ledawg
ledawg writes:
on May 18 2009 05:36 PM

Alright Jen, you got yerself the Terminator! Two great sci-fi's and T3! Anyway, I love this film. 10/10. It has humor, action, chills, spills (of blood), and a great cast. And this film is highly effective in making The Terminator feel unstoppable. He gets run over by a truck, keeps going. The truck blows up on him, keeps going. He gets a gernade in the belly, keeps going. DAMN! Plus, he's so freakin' cool. A gun, glasses, motorcycle, leather jacket. I never beleived a wuss like Reese could take him. Anyway, good job.

(Reply to this)
willywonkanobi
willywonkanobi writes:
on May 18 2009 05:38 PM

shoot yes! GREAT MOVIE! Good overview, Jen.

Can't wait for Salvation, but I am only cautiously optimistic about it. 17% Fresh Rating so far... not too great. I must confess I am worried.


(Reply to this)
John D.
John D. writes:
on May 18 2009 05:45 PM

A classic no doubt. I love how we are constantly told, "You can't stop it, You can't stop it, and it won't give up until you are dead" But hold on, if have a pit of molten lava, then you can stop it no problem!

(Reply to this)
ledawg
ledawg writes:
on May 18 2009 05:46 PM

In reply to this comment (#2484217)
Yeah, but the reviews are few for "Salvation". But, most likely it will stay rotten.

(Reply to this)
ARTaylor
ARTaylor writes:
on May 18 2009 05:54 PM

Terminator is one of those great movies that has permeated itself into American culture. So that even children who have never seen the movie know about it.

I would have loved to see it back in the day. Problem is it's so well known that the surprises just aren't surprising anymore. But it's still a perfect movie.


(Reply to this)
KingSigy
KingSigy writes:
on May 18 2009 05:55 PM

While are you are about the war taking place in 2029, I believe this movie takes place in the 80's. The Terminator does go back in time, so it would make sense why all the technology is crappy.
Everytime I see those special effects at the end (the stop motion done by Tool guitarist Adam Jones), I just laugh a little. It's not that it doesn't look robotic (because it certainly does), but it just sticks out slightly when you compare it to T2 only 7 years later (which had technology that surpasses even some of today's films).
This was a very good write-up, though. The Terminator is a movie that was literally not faltered at all with time. I think the reasoning is that the low-budget style made Ahnold perform his own stunts (he burns his eyebrows off in that car chase) and the call-backs to classic Horror films made this sci-fi, future dystopia seem real.
I can't wait to see what you say about T2. I think everyone can agree that is the better of the first two films, but I just love hearing more praise about that from everyone.


(Reply to this)
Chris B.
Chris B. writes:
on May 18 2009 06:28 PM

yeah the first terminator was awesome. but i don't understand how you say that the only drawback is that this movie is dated. it was made in 1984 on a low-budget. i mean come on. and it's not like they had any choice but to use the technology that was available to them. the t-800 was from the year 2029 for God's sake.

(Reply to this)
ZigBallistic
ZigBallistic writes:
on May 18 2009 06:36 PM

About the bit with the circular history. It is a theme in the movies and the TV show that with everything the people from the future do in the past changes the ever fluid future. Maybe the "original" John Connor (the one who sends back Reese) wasn't conceived by Kyle. The kid that is born from the copulation of Sarah and Kyle is instead a different soul who also has the name "John" because of an assumed destiny that maybe is not supposed to be his.

(Reply to this)
GreenBastard
GreenBastard writes:
on May 18 2009 06:59 PM

I'm not sure about Claire Danes wrecking the third Terminator. I'd say a female Terminator with self inflating breasts might have something to do with it!

(Reply to this)
rebranded001
rebranded001 writes:
on May 18 2009 07:02 PM

The only really good part about this movie was Linda Hamilton's eggs-on-nails.

This POS is so dated you can smell the hair spray and Alberto VO8.


(Reply to this)
Dominem007
Dominem007 writes:
on May 18 2009 07:25 PM

Um just HOW IS THIS A "REVIEW" of the movie???

We all know what happens in The Terminator Jen....Im pretty sure that most people that visit this site have seen all of the major classic Hollywood films that have come out. When you guys were counting down the days to Bond and Star Trek, you were reviewing all of the other things and basically stating what you liked about these movies....and what you did not like.

I want your take on this film, you only talk about the fact that it's somewhat "dated"....I know what happens in this movie....can you actually review Terminator 2 and Terminator 3 over the next couple of days please? As well as Salvation....that would actually be really nice to read.


(Reply to this)
Dominem007
Dominem007 writes:
on May 18 2009 07:25 PM

Um just HOW IS THIS A "REVIEW" of the movie???

We all know what happens in The Terminator Jen....Im pretty sure that most people that visit this site have seen all of the major classic Hollywood films that have come out. When you guys were counting down the days to Bond and Star Trek, you were reviewing all of the other things and basically stating what you liked about these movies....and what you did not like.

I want your take on this film, you only talk about the fact that it's somewhat "dated"....I know what happens in this movie....can you actually review Terminator 2 and Terminator 3 over the next couple of days please? As well as Salvation....that would actually be really nice to read.


(Reply to this)
willpower
willpower writes:
on May 18 2009 08:33 PM

I agree Dominem. This is a synopsis, not a review. WTH?

(Reply to this)
ColinTheCimmerian
ColinTheCimmerian writes:
on May 18 2009 08:39 PM

Good article, I like your stressing of the horror aspects of the movie. That's something I've always felt strongly about but many people seem to overlook, probably because 2 and 3 are very much action movies and people tend to extend that perspective over the entire franchise. But the first Terminator is very much a horror movie. The girl next door protagonist who survives til the end while everyone around her slowly gets picked off one by one by the unstoppable monster? Sounds a lot like a whole bunch of slasher and monster movies. I think one of the most impressive things about this movie is how Cameron took that relatively old concept and put an entirely new spin on it, adding something all those other horror movies didn't have, namely an involving and clever plot, as well as a high-concept central conflict with epic-scale consequences. The only thing at stake in a typical slasher movie is the lives of maybe a dozen people, but in The Terminator, it's not just about Reese saving the girl and killing the monster, it's about saving the future of humanity. That elevated the movie from standard low-budget B horror movie to something a little more special.

I really liked Michael Biehn in this movie, and in most of his later roles. Too bad his career never really took off; I'm really not sure why it didn't. Maybe if Cameron had eventually made his Spider-man movie, we would have seen Biehn become a bona fide star; accordind to my understanding, he was Cameron's pick for the lead role.

Looking forward to the rest of these articles, the Terminator films are a particular passion of mine, and I don't hesitate to call T2 my #1 favourite movie, so I'm interested to see what you have to say about it.


(Reply to this)
ColinTheCimmerian
ColinTheCimmerian writes:
on May 18 2009 08:47 PM

@ Dominem, willpower:

Jeez you guys are tough to please; where does it say anywhere that this article is meant to be a review? The word used in the intro is 'revisit', which basically just means 'look at again'. The author can write whatever they want. I bet you guys always complain about the RT lists being wrong too. Take these articles for what they are, not what you want them to be.


(Reply to this)
martinscorsese25
martinscorsese25 writes:
on May 18 2009 09:12 PM

man, i have little hope for terminator salvation... it has 14% on its tomato meter... **** McG, he is gonna ruined Christian Bale's track record... let's hope it gets higher up to 70%... i really hope that this won't be Bale's 'Batman and Robin' where the star(Clooney) is ashamed that he ever made the movie

(Reply to this)
RexLaboro
RexLaboro writes:
on May 18 2009 09:14 PM

Can I make one of these? Like with HTML and pics and stuff?

(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2 3
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

Terminator Salvation
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • Terminator Franchise Headed for Auction Opens in new window (22)
  • Sam Worthington Talks Terminator Salvation, Avatar Teaser Reactions Opens in new window (56)
  • McG Talks Next Terminator Sequel Opens in new window (84)
  • Box-office: Terminator Hungover (3)
  • Terminator Finds Salvation With International Audiences Opens in new window (28)
  • Top 10 Terminator Moments (8)
  • Why Terminator Salvation Isn't a Terminator Film Opens in new window (38)
  • Review Terminator Salvation, Night at the Museum 2, and Dance Flick on TV! (6)
  • Jen Gets Terminated, Day 4: Terminator Salvation (119)
  • Critics Consensus: Terminator, Night Are So-So Sequels (82)

Most Discussed

  • Total Recall: George Clooney's Best Movies (91)
  • Critics Consensus: A Christmas Carol Dazzles But Disappoints (43)
  • Ho-ho-horror! 10 Scary Christmas Movies (36)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Abrams eyes Micronauts, Aykroyd as Yogi Bear (32)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Christmas Carol Tops, Precious Rocks (29)
  • Friday Harvest: Prince of Persia, The Road, and more! (24)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (14)
  • RT on DVD: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (0)

Latest News

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Christmas Carol Tops, Precious Rocks (29)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Abrams eyes Micronauts, Aykroyd as Yogi Bear (33)
  • Friday Harvest: Prince of Persia, The Road, and more! (24)
  • Critics Consensus: A Christmas Carol Dazzles But Disappoints (43)
  • Ho-ho-horror! 10 Scary Christmas Movies (36)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (14)
  • RT on DVD: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (0)
  • Total Recall: George Clooney's Best Movies (91)
  • 12 Facts About 2012 (132)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: This Is It Tops Box Office Worldwide (55)

Latest Interviews

  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (14)
  • Richard Kelly chats about The Box (1)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (15)
  • Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (8)
  • Wolverine Creator Len Wein Talks About the Film (28)
  • Gavin Hood Talks Wolverine; Possible Sequel (28)
  • Duncan Jones talks Moon, Sam Rockwell, and Mute (14)
  • Emma Stone talks Zombieland - RT Interview (40)
  • Michael Moore: The RT Interview (139)
  • Andrea Arnold talks Fish Tank - RT Interview (4)

Latest Features

  • Ho-ho-horror! 10 Scary Christmas Movies (36)
  • RT on DVD: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (0)
  • 12 Facts About 2012 (132)
  • RT on DVD: Star Trek Beams In (4)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (15)
  • Five Favourite Films with 24's Carlos Bernard (33)
  • Six Horrible Part Sixes (32)
  • RT on DVD: Land of the Lost and Hannah Montana (5)
  • Christopher Smith's Favourite Cult Horror Films (14)
  • Gavin Hood Talks Wolverine; Possible Sequel (28)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.