Platinum Dunes Announces "Birds" Remake
I know, I know: You hear the phrase "Birds remake" and you start getting all fidgety and mad. That's a good reaction to have. But producer Brad Fuller wants to make one thing perfectly clear: The new-fangled version of "The Birds" is a new re-telling of the original short story, period. Those expecting stuff found in the Hitchcock flick will probably be disappointed.
From our pals at IGN FilmForce: "We're not remaking Hitchcock's movie. That movie stands on its own and it is a wonderful piece of filmmaking. It's a very difficult thing to say, 'We're remaking a Hitchcock film,'" Fuller said. "What was interesting to us was that the short story [by Daphne Du Maurier] the Hitchcock film was based on was chock full of stuff that Hitchcock didn't use in his film. And so we went to those things and that's the basis of our film. It's the same title because it's based on the same short story but we don't have characters like what they have. The concept of birds, certainly, that's the core of the movie but the situations and the plot come from the short story not from the Hitchcock film."
IGN learned that "The Birds" will be scripted by the writing team of Stiles White and Juliet Snowden ("Boogeyman")."
Hell, still a remake, tho. Right?
From our pals at IGN FilmForce: "We're not remaking Hitchcock's movie. That movie stands on its own and it is a wonderful piece of filmmaking. It's a very difficult thing to say, 'We're remaking a Hitchcock film,'" Fuller said. "What was interesting to us was that the short story [by Daphne Du Maurier] the Hitchcock film was based on was chock full of stuff that Hitchcock didn't use in his film. And so we went to those things and that's the basis of our film. It's the same title because it's based on the same short story but we don't have characters like what they have. The concept of birds, certainly, that's the core of the movie but the situations and the plot come from the short story not from the Hitchcock film."
IGN learned that "The Birds" will be scripted by the writing team of Stiles White and Juliet Snowden ("Boogeyman")."
Hell, still a remake, tho. Right?
Related Items
| Celeb: | Brad Fuller |
| Alfred Hitchcock | |
| Stiles White | |
| Juliet Snowden | |
| Movie: | Boogeyman |
| The Birds |
|
fatmc writes: on Jul 03 2006 05:08 AM [b]no!!!!!![/b] stop doing remakes!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
GRD writes: on Jul 03 2006 06:00 AM In reply to this comment (#839422) Interesting. The original story was set among a farm family in England. I don't know why Hitch changed it, but almost nothing was the same as in the story. I don't think a single character in the film resembled any of the story characters. So if they're going back to that, this movie will be very different from Hitch's, and hopefully not as awful as most remakes. (Reply to this) |
|
VML writes: on Jul 03 2006 09:21 AM There should be a law that would make remakes to Hitchcock films illegal. (Reply to this) |
|
KwazyWabbit writes: on Jul 03 2006 11:47 AM These people are treading thin ice. They slip on one crack this film will go down hill. Although the original story would be intresting to see. (Reply to this) |
|
SuperS writes: on Jul 03 2006 12:16 PM In reply to this comment (#839424) I second that. (Reply to this) |
|
ArmyofJuan writes: on Jul 03 2006 01:30 PM In reality though, they arnt really "re-making" a hitchcock film. They are just adapting the same story. Like Peter Jackson didn't "re-make" who ever did those animated lotr films, he just followed the book. (Reply to this) |
|
Now it's dark writes: on Jul 03 2006 02:26 PM Hitchcock, like Kubrick, was smart enough to throw out things from a book that did nothing to help tell the story in the film it was based on. Guess they're smarter than Hitchcock. Or just plain greedy. Or unimaginative. Or both. Probably both. (Reply to this) |
|
cowsfan writes: on Jul 04 2006 06:31 AM Hitchcock would be rolling in his grave if he wasn't already doing so over all the crappy imitations of his style in the last who knows how many years. (Reply to this) |
|
dracus writes: on Jul 04 2006 06:34 AM "Um dude, like um, we're not remaking Hitchcock's movie, okay? Shuh!" Give me a bloody break! (Reply to this) |
|
GRD writes: on Jul 04 2006 07:10 AM In reply to this comment (#839428) It's not quite the same thing. Hitch didn't throw out things from the story; he completely changed it. The ONLY thing that was the same was the element that gives the movie its title: the birds (and their method of attack). Everything else was different: different characters, different country, different everything. That said, though, I'm sure these people probably won't make a better movie than Hitch, simply because very few people are capable of making a better movie than Hitch. (Reply to this) |
|
pota1967 writes: on Jul 04 2006 01:00 PM brought to you by the writers of "Boogeyman" hahahaha nuff said (Reply to this) |
|
DarthWonka writes: on Jul 05 2006 08:54 PM Kinda like the way Tim Burton didn't remake "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory" but did his own, masterful (and IMHO superior) adaptation of the Dahl book. Only thing is, I'm not sure if such a thing can be pulled off twice. Is Tim Burton making this movie? (Reply to this) |
|
pdxstudent writes: on Oct 19 2007 10:47 AM I agree with GRD. Hitchcock was rarely one to simply make a book into a movie, unless his sleezy Hollywood producer forced him to (only once, in "Rebecca," and Hitchcock still got the last laugh). Hitch wrote screen-plays, because he was interested in making film, not live-action books. If this new director can make something interesting out of the story, it should stand as a testament to this director's ability to successfully adapt a different reading of the story to film, because frankly, a film is not nor should be the live-action doopleganger of an original story. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |







