Peter Jackson Responds to New Line Nastiness
Just yesterday we reported that New Line chief Bob Shaye was, like, reallllllly mad at Peter Jackson, and also that he pretty much blacklisted the filmmaker from ever darkening the NL doors again. Less than 24 hours later, we have a response from Mr. Jackson.
As is often the case, Peter Jackson communicates to the internetted world by way of AICN. Here's exactly (and completely) what the man had to say: "Our issue with New Line Cinema has only ever been about their refusal to account for financial anomalies that surfaced from a partial audit of The Fellowship of the Ring. Contrary to recent comments made by Bob Shaye, we attempted to discuss the issues raised by the Fellowship audit with New Line for over a year but the studio was and continues to be completely uncooperative. This has compelled us to file a lawsuit to pursue our contractual rights under the law. Nobody likes taking legal action, but the studio left us with no alternative.
For over two years, New Line has denied us the ability to audit The Two Towers and The Return of the King, despite repeated requests. Film auditing is a common and straightforward practice within the industry and we don't understand why New Line Cinema has taken this position.
In light of these circumstances, I didn't think it was appropriate for me to be involved in New Line Cinema's 40th Anniversary video. I have never discussed this video with any of the cast of The Lord of the Rings. The issues that Bob Shaye has with the cast pre-date this law suit by many years.
Fundamentally, our legal action is about holding New Line to it's contractual obligations and promises. It is regrettable that Bob has chosen to make it personal. I have always had the highest respect and affection for Bob and other senior management at New Line and continue to do so."
---
Kinda makes one wonder why Shaye would have gone public with this sort of stuff in the first place. I mean, it sure does make for some pretty juicy reading, but don't these types of battles generally take place behind closed doors? Do these mega-rich movie-makers actually CARE what we think about broken promises, hurt feelings and unfinished audits?
All I know is I want a "Hobbit" movie. If Peter Jackson can't direct it, I say give the thing to Terry Gilliam. Who's with me?
As is often the case, Peter Jackson communicates to the internetted world by way of AICN. Here's exactly (and completely) what the man had to say: "Our issue with New Line Cinema has only ever been about their refusal to account for financial anomalies that surfaced from a partial audit of The Fellowship of the Ring. Contrary to recent comments made by Bob Shaye, we attempted to discuss the issues raised by the Fellowship audit with New Line for over a year but the studio was and continues to be completely uncooperative. This has compelled us to file a lawsuit to pursue our contractual rights under the law. Nobody likes taking legal action, but the studio left us with no alternative.
For over two years, New Line has denied us the ability to audit The Two Towers and The Return of the King, despite repeated requests. Film auditing is a common and straightforward practice within the industry and we don't understand why New Line Cinema has taken this position.
In light of these circumstances, I didn't think it was appropriate for me to be involved in New Line Cinema's 40th Anniversary video. I have never discussed this video with any of the cast of The Lord of the Rings. The issues that Bob Shaye has with the cast pre-date this law suit by many years.
Fundamentally, our legal action is about holding New Line to it's contractual obligations and promises. It is regrettable that Bob has chosen to make it personal. I have always had the highest respect and affection for Bob and other senior management at New Line and continue to do so."
---
Kinda makes one wonder why Shaye would have gone public with this sort of stuff in the first place. I mean, it sure does make for some pretty juicy reading, but don't these types of battles generally take place behind closed doors? Do these mega-rich movie-makers actually CARE what we think about broken promises, hurt feelings and unfinished audits?
All I know is I want a "Hobbit" movie. If Peter Jackson can't direct it, I say give the thing to Terry Gilliam. Who's with me?
Related Items
| Celeb: | Peter Jackson |
| Robert Shaye | |
| Terry Gilliam | |
| Movie: | The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers |
| The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King | |
| The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring |
|
mystwoman writes: on Jan 12 2007 03:50 AM [b]Disney should grab rights, htt (Reply to this) |
|
Travis27 writes: on Jan 12 2007 05:53 AM I won't be watching if it isn't PJ at the helm. It wouldn't be the same. (Reply to this) |
|
Majesty writes: on Jan 12 2007 06:05 AM Go Bob Shaye! Go!! If Peter Jackson's out, we may actually have a good movie! (Reply to this) |
|
Care19 writes: on Jan 12 2007 06:50 AM It doesn't matter how many millions PJ was paid - it's the principal. You can't screw someone of monies owed just because you think they got enough. it's beginning to sound like New Line are the big greedy baddies here. Who will want to work with a company that has such sketchy practices? (Reply to this) |
|
randal1013 writes: on Jan 12 2007 08:22 AM im not watching the hobbit if peter jackson doesn't direct it. (Reply to this) |
|
Pilgermann writes: on Jan 12 2007 08:29 AM While a Terry Gilliam directed Hobbit film would be good for him financially, I don't think he's the right guy for it. I just want to see THE MAN WHO KILLED DON QUIXOTE, GOOD OMENS, and THE DEFECTIVE DETECTIVE. Oh, and everyone will still see THE HOBBIT if Peter Jackson doesn't direct it. (Reply to this) |
|
Zen Bullet writes: on Jan 12 2007 08:35 AM I don't know why New Line decided to take this public. But considering how Peter's camp has kept their cool while armed with clear, concise logic . . . and Shaye exercises a purely emotional attack . . . I think it's fairly obvious who is digging their own grave here. I want Jackson to direct the Hobbit. And while there are a few directors who can probably handle the material (Alfonso Cauron comes to mind, obviously), I hope that New Line loses the rights. (Reply to this) |
|
Bane Of Anubis writes: on Jan 12 2007 08:47 AM In reply to this comment (#852919) AC for the Hobbit? Maybe -- didn't like him for HP3, but his style would work well for a more adult movie (albeit one that involves hobbitzes).... As for Jackson, he's always come across as a classy guy -- With his current clout, he could run roughshod over New Line, but he's taken the high road...Nice (Reply to this) |
|
taran72 writes: on Jan 12 2007 09:13 AM New Line seems really defensive and pissed. If it wasn't for their weird bitterness, this would have just been a blurb about how PJ is questioning their accounting practices. Why so angry? It's just business. It sounds like NL has something to hide. Now they may miss out on making big bucks off The Hobbit. As for Terry Gilliam, his best days may be behind him. Sadly. (Reply to this) |
|
Now it's dark writes: on Jan 12 2007 10:21 AM I won't see the Hobbit if PJ ain't directing. (Reply to this) |
|
Sputnik99 writes: on Jan 12 2007 11:12 AM Peter Jackson, I dare you to drop your case and move on. You know this problem has grown too big for even your old britches. (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jan 12 2007 12:07 PM In reply to this comment (#852924) In the words of Dave Chappelle "HHHHHWHAAATTTT!!!!" What point are you trying to make here? (Reply to this) |
|
rgallitan writes: on Jan 12 2007 12:10 PM In reply to this comment (#852923) Good god people. Jackson accomplished quite a feat with the Lord of the Rings films, not least of all simply by finishing them, but he's hardly infallible. The second film was choppy and the third over-ponderous, and, overall, my opinion of Jackson is that he's a visionary director and a sloppy writer. King Kong certainly makes that case. I'm sure that Jackson could craft a perfectly good Hobbit film, but I'm also sure a few other directors could do it as well. Keep in mind that the Hobbit is very different in both substance and style from the Lord of the Rings. There's nothing in Jackson's repertoire that suggests he could handle its more whimsical narrative better than everybody else. (Reply to this) |
|
amamamy writes: on Jan 12 2007 01:02 PM In reply to this comment (#852913) [b]New Line are a bunch of crooks[/b] Bob Shaye had a film school intern on staff (UNPAID intern, by the way) whose sole job was to walk his dog. This is before, of course, the dog jumped to its death off a cruise ship because Shaye refused to put it on a leash. Bob Shaye is a scumbag. (Reply to this) |
|
Now it's dark writes: on Jan 12 2007 01:20 PM In reply to this comment (#852926) Continuity has a lot to do with it. (Reply to this) |
|
FILMCZY writes: on Jan 12 2007 01:33 PM New Line took a HUGE risk allowing PJ to direct three movies in a row w/o knowing if the first one was going to be any good. History has now spoken. New Line has made a bundle off this franchise and I'm sure they have not followed "industry standards" in documenting the money made from these films. PJ and his crew have a right to know what is owed him and not just off the first film. Did New Line take advantage of Jackson who was relatively unknown at the time these films were being made? I think the answer is yes. (Reply to this) |
|
nogard64 writes: on Jan 12 2007 02:24 PM [b]The hobbit will be fine if they get.....[/b] ALFONSO CUARON!!!! I think someone already said it but oh man you all know it will work!!! It will be great! Jack Black as Bilbo Baggins! If you read the book Bilbo is a very brave and almost non hobbit kinda hobbit. By that I mean he seeks new places and new adventures things regular hobbits dont do. Pete was great but theres is room for others. (Reply to this) |
|
bkkramb writes: on Jan 12 2007 04:54 PM Alfonso Cuaron would probably find some way to address the immigration issue in The Hobbit I'm sure. :) I liked Children of Men a lot by the way. Haven't seen any Harry Potter films. (Reply to this) |
|
saiga6360 writes: on Jan 12 2007 05:22 PM I haven't read The Hobbit in a long while but from what I can recall, it doesn't fit Cuaron's style so he may not even touch this with a 10 foot pole. (Reply to this) |
|
nogard64 writes: on Jan 12 2007 06:30 PM [b]I WANT ALFONSO CUARON TO DIRECT MY LIFE![/b] yeah my life sucks right now maybe he can come and make it all better by telling me where to go and what to be please! (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |







